Derpyu520/qq-bridge
Bridge between QQ (SnowLuma OneBot v11) and DeepSeek Harness agents: social simulation, safe MCP tools, slang learning and more.
3.6k stars · 280 forks · JavaScript
Quick update: star history is from the full report of Oct 25, 2026.
Caution
One person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 81% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
- Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.)
Maintenance
PartialActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 84
- Human commits, 90 days
- 127
- Human commits, 365 days
- 127
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Nov 11, 2026 (1 day ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 11, 2026 (1 day ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 7
- Last release
- Oct 31, 2026 (11 days ago)
- Median PR merge time
- 13 hours
Responsiveness: of 12 recent issues, 67% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: 27 days.
- Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
- Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Nov 12, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 6
Top committers
- Derpyu520: 81% of commits
- audit: 9% of commits
- NormalTable5801: 5% of commits
- xingchen-mu: 2% of commits
- fander001: 1% of commits
- Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence medium
Bursts
- Oct 19, 2026 to Oct 24, 2026: about 829 more stars than usual, peak 209 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
- Star history from the full report of Oct 25, 2026; this update did not re-read it.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: Derpyu520/qq-bridge
Compare
Weighing Derpyu520/qq-bridge against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/Derpyu520/qq-bridge)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/Derpyu520/qq-bridge/feed.xmlMore repos rated Caution
- sligter/
LandPPT 3.7k stars - buchidonggua/
dg-ai-notes 3.6k stars - yanliudesign/
mono-color-skill 3.6k stars - Javis603/
token-monitor 3.7k stars - amitshekhariitbhu/
ai-engineering-interview-questions 3.6k stars - eracle/
OpenOutreach 3.7k stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 12, 2026: Caution
- Nov 11, 2026: Caution
- Nov 10, 2026: Caution
- Nov 9, 2026: Caution
- Nov 8, 2026: Caution
- Nov 7, 2026: Caution
- Nov 6, 2026: Caution
- Nov 5, 2026: Caution
- Nov 4, 2026: Caution
- Nov 3, 2026: Caution