DilawarShafiq/nietzschian-debugger
It won't fix your bug. It'll fix you. The debugger that hands the question back instead of the answer.
557 stars · 21 forks · Python
Quick update: star history is from the full report of Nov 1, 2026.
Caution
One person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 100% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
Maintenance
CompleteActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 47
- Human commits, 90 days
- 49
- Human commits, 365 days
- 73
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Oct 27, 2026 (15 days ago)
- Last human commit
- Oct 27, 2026 (15 days ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 1
- Last release
- Oct 27, 2026 (15 days ago)
- Median PR merge time
- n/a
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 73 since Nov 12, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 1
Top committers
- DilawarShafiq: 100% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence medium
- The star history was reset at some point, so earlier stars aren't counted.
- Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
- The star history has a zero run of 26 weeks or more, so the analysis starts after it.
- Star history from the full report of Nov 1, 2026; this update did not re-read it.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- MIT (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
- nietzschian-debugger (PYPI): latest 0.5.2, published Oct 27, 2026
Advisories for the latest version: none listed
Package and advisory data: deps.dev and OSV.
Sources: GitHub: DilawarShafiq/nietzschian-debugger, deps.dev: PyPI nietzschian-debugger
Compare
Weighing DilawarShafiq/nietzschian-debugger against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/DilawarShafiq/nietzschian-debugger)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/DilawarShafiq/nietzschian-debugger/feed.xmlMore repos rated Caution
- tis24dev/
proxsave 575 stars - docsagent/
docsagent 579 stars - haoruilee/
awesome-agent-native-services 606 stars - amazonlinux/
amazon-linux-2023 633 stars - LTplus-AG/
ifc-lite 471 stars - openclaw/
openclaw-enterprise 459 stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 12, 2026: Caution
- Nov 11, 2026: Caution
- Nov 10, 2026: Caution
- Nov 9, 2026: Caution
- Nov 8, 2026: Caution
- Nov 7, 2026: Caution
- Nov 6, 2026: Caution
- Nov 5, 2026: Caution
- Nov 4, 2026: Caution
- Nov 3, 2026: Caution