Eigenwise/atomic-agents
Building AI agents, atomically
6.3k stars · 564 forks · Python
Caution
One person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 71% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
Maintenance
CompleteActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 61
- Human commits, 90 days
- 151
- Human commits, 365 days
- 349
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 1%
- Last commit
- Nov 14, 2026 (14 hours ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 14, 2026 (14 hours ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 24
- Last release
- Nov 14, 2026 (14 hours ago)
- Median PR merge time
- 26 hours
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Only 1 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 349 since Nov 15, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 3
- Contributors
- 56
Top committers
- Eigenwise: 71% of commits
- Afloat16: 6% of commits
- JuampiHernandez: 4% of commits
- liangzhechen655: 2% of commits
- r-dr-dtheta: 1% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence high
Bursts
- Oct 23, 2024 to Nov 18, 2024: about 617 more stars than usual, peak 56 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jul 14, 2025 to Jul 19, 2025: about 161 more stars than usual, peak 49 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- MIT (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- MIT (OSI-approved)
Packages
- atomic-agents (PYPI): latest 2.16.0, published Nov 14, 2026
Advisories for the latest version: none listed
Package and advisory data: deps.dev and OSV.
Sources: GitHub: Eigenwise/atomic-agents, deps.dev: PyPI atomic-agents
Compare
Weighing Eigenwise/atomic-agents against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/Eigenwise/atomic-agents)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/Eigenwise/atomic-agents/feed.xmlMore repos rated Caution
- jihe520/
MathModelAgent 6.3k stars - Jakubantalik/
transitions.dev 6.3k stars - ikaijua/
Awesome-AITools 6.3k stars - kaomei/
stickman-video-director 6.3k stars - macro-inc/
macro 6.3k stars - HelixDB/
helix-db 6.3k stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 15, 2026: Caution