GeeeekExplorer/nano-vllm

Maintenance

Slowing

Human commits, 30 days

0

Human commits, 90 days

0

Human commits, 365 days

22

Bot share of commits, 365 days

0%

Last commit

Apr 26, 2026 (5 months ago)

Last human commit

Apr 26, 2026 (5 months ago)

Authors, 90 days

0

Last release

none found

Median PR merge time

10 hours

Responsiveness: of 5 recent issues, 0% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Owner

Personal account

Commits sampled

22 since Oct 14, 2025

Authors for half of commits

1

Authors for 80% of commits

4

Contributors

12

Top committers

• GeeeekExplorer: 50% of commits
• GeekExplorer: 18% of commits
• Anai-Guo: 9% of commits
• guodongxiaren: 5% of commits
• IceCreamMilkyTea: 5% of commits

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Organic, confidence high

Bursts

• Nov 1, 2025 to Nov 20, 2025: about 1.6k more stars than usual, peak 308 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Dec 18, 2025 to Dec 25, 2025: about 321 more stars than usual, peak 86 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Feb 2, 2026 to Feb 3, 2026: about 106 more stars than usual, peak 101 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Mar 30, 2026 to Mar 30, 2026: about 54 more stars than usual, peak 76 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.

• 1 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

• The star history looks organic.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Flags

No risk flags.

License

Now

MIT (OSI-approved)

A year ago

MIT (OSI-approved)

Packages

No published packages found.

Sources: GitHub: GeeeekExplorer/nano-vllm