NARKOZ/hacker-scripts
Based on a true story
49.8k stars · 6.6k forks · JavaScript
At risk
At risk: no human commits in a year.
Why
- No human commits since August 2022. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
- GitHub found no license file, so the code is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A release or merged commit from a maintainer.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteDormant
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Aug 7, 2022 (4 years ago)
- Last human commit
- Aug 7, 2022 (4 years ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- 8 hours
Responsiveness: of 3 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 3 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
- 33 pull requests are open and nobody has committed in a year.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Nov 27, 2015
- Authors for half of commits
- 2
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 20
- Contributors
- 47
Top committers
- NARKOZ: 44% of commits
- ahmad-sam-m: 6% of commits
- robaganrab: 4% of commits
- Akshay Kashyap: 3% of commits
- alexesprit: 3% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2015-11-27T12:05:06Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteMostly organic, confidence high
Bursts
- Apr 7, 2016 to Apr 12, 2016: about 276 more stars than usual, peak 100 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Aug 18, 2016 to Aug 25, 2016: about 262 more stars than usual, peak 137 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Aug 27, 2016 to Aug 29, 2016: about 102 more stars than usual, peak 50 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 15, 2016 to Sep 23, 2016: about 557 more stars than usual, peak 158 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Nov 10, 2016 to Nov 12, 2016: about 220 more stars than usual, peak 120 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Nov 26, 2016 to Nov 30, 2016: about 148 more stars than usual, peak 56 in one day, a flat block of stars. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jul 6, 2017 to Jul 7, 2017: about 93 more stars than usual, peak 59 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Oct 25, 2017 to Oct 26, 2017: about 81 more stars than usual, peak 73 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Dec 12, 2017 to Dec 13, 2017: about 62 more stars than usual, peak 60 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Apr 9, 2019 to Apr 17, 2019: about 1.6k more stars than usual, peak 799 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jul 21, 2019 to Jul 25, 2019: about 102 more stars than usual, peak 50 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jan 15, 2020 to Jan 24, 2020: about 573 more stars than usual, peak 116 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Jun 30, 2020 to Jul 9, 2020: about 983 more stars than usual, peak 447 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Aug 28, 2020 to Sep 1, 2020: about 75 more stars than usual, peak 40 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Oct 9, 2020 to Oct 13, 2020: about 452 more stars than usual, peak 174 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Nov 8, 2020 to Nov 9, 2020: about 83 more stars than usual, peak 75 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jan 6, 2021 to Jan 11, 2021: about 546 more stars than usual, peak 185 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Sep 12, 2021 to Sep 16, 2021: about 294 more stars than usual, peak 165 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Dec 4, 2021 to Dec 15, 2021: about 714 more stars than usual, peak 180 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- May 3, 2022 to May 19, 2022: about 407 more stars than usual, peak 50 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Apr 6, 2023 to Apr 14, 2023: about 846 more stars than usual, peak 522 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Dec 15, 2024 to Dec 18, 2024: about 69 more stars than usual, peak 41 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Mar 23, 2025 to Mar 26, 2025: about 225 more stars than usual, peak 113 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jul 12, 2025 to Jul 14, 2025: about 87 more stars than usual, peak 54 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Oct 21, 2025 to Oct 24, 2025: about 163 more stars than usual, peak 95 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 5, 2025: about 297 more stars than usual, peak 172 in one day, a shape we can't classify. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Jun 10, 2026 to Jun 15, 2026: about 219 more stars than usual, peak 124 in one day, a shape we can't classify. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- 1 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 13, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Some star bursts have no matching forks, issues, releases, or launch coverage.
- Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
- Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 2.5 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 2.5 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Sources: GitHub: NARKOZ/hacker-scripts
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/NARKOZ/hacker-scripts)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: At risk
- Oct 13, 2026: At risk
- Oct 13, 2026: At risk
Computed 16 hours ago · method 2026.10.2