Sahir619/fable-method
The Fable Workflow: how Claude Fable 5 worked, distilled into skills any model can run, with the eval that keeps it honest. Think / act / prove.
2.3k stars · 328 forks · Python
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 94% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
Maintenance
CompleteSlowing
- Human commits, 30 days
- 1
- Human commits, 90 days
- 1
- Human commits, 365 days
- 16
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Oct 3, 2026 (12 days ago)
- Last human commit
- Oct 3, 2026 (12 days ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 1
- Last release
- Jul 15, 2026 (3 months ago)
- Median PR merge time
- n/a
Responsiveness: of 3 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 3 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 16 since Oct 15, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 2
Top committers
- Sahir619: 94% of commits
- pannal: 6% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence medium
- Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- MIT (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: Sahir619/fable-method
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/Sahir619/fable-method)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 15, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 3 hours ago · method 2026.10.2