ai-for-developers/awesome-ai-coding-tools

A curated list of AI-powered coding tools

2.2k stars · 867 forks

This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.

Caution

Caution: one person wrote most of the recent commits.

Why

One person wrote 100% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
Maintainers took a median of 31 days to first respond to 17 recent issues. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)

What would change this

A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
Maintainers reply faster, with a median under 30 days.
Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.)

Maintenance

Partial

Active

Human commits, 30 days: 691
Human commits, 90 days: 800
Human commits, 365 days: 1.4k
Bot share of commits, 365 days: 0%
Last commit: Sep 18, 2026 (26 days ago)
Last human commit: Sep 18, 2026 (26 days ago)
Authors, 90 days: 2
Last release: none found
Median PR merge time: 14 days

Responsiveness: of 17 recent issues, 18% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: 31 days.

Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Complete

Owner: Organization
Commits sampled: 500 since Oct 15, 2025
Authors for half of commits: 1
Authors for 80% of commits: 1
Contributors: 344

Top committers

a69: 100% of commits
fisher-byte: 0% of commits

Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Complete

Mostly organic, confidence low

Bars show stars gained each week. Orange bars overlap a burst.

Bursts

Sep 6, 2025 to Sep 10, 2025: about 166 more stars than usual, peak 108 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 14, 2025: about 49 more stars than usual, peak 41 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
Dec 22, 2025 to Dec 22, 2025: about 26 more stars than usual, peak 28 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
Feb 6, 2026 to Feb 7, 2026: about 30 more stars than usual, peak 24 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
Jun 15, 2026 to Jun 18, 2026: about 53 more stars than usual, peak 26 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
Aug 10, 2026 to Aug 10, 2026: about 26 more stars than usual, peak 28 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

Some star bursts have no matching forks, issues, releases, or launch coverage.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.
Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Complete

Flags

No risk flags.

License

Now: MIT (OSI-approved)
A year ago: MIT (OSI-approved)

Packages

No published packages found.

Sources: GitHub: ai-for-developers/awesome-ai-coding-tools

Badge

Add this to a README to show the current verdict:

[![RepoRadar](https://reporadar.ai/ai-for-developers/awesome-ai-coding-tools/badge.svg)](https://reporadar.ai/ai-for-developers/awesome-ai-coding-tools)

Earlier verdicts

Oct 15, 2026: Caution
Oct 14, 2026: Caution

Computed 2 hours ago · method 2026.10.2