awesomedata/awesome-public-datasets
A topic-centric list of HQ open datasets.
79.5k stars · 11.9k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 100% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
- Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.; Only 3 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.)
Maintenance
PartialActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 264
- Human commits, 90 days
- 538
- Human commits, 365 days
- 649
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Oct 13, 2026 (1 day ago)
- Last human commit
- Oct 13, 2026 (1 day ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 1
- Last release
- Sep 3, 2023 (3 years ago)
- Median PR merge time
- 16 days
Responsiveness: of 3 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
- Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.
- Only 3 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Organization
- Commits sampled
- 500 since Oct 14, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 141
Top committers
- caesar0301: 100% of commits
- Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteMostly organic, confidence high
Bursts
- Mar 3, 2015 to Mar 5, 2015: about 82 more stars than usual, peak 49 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Apr 17, 2015 to May 3, 2015: about 1.7k more stars than usual, peak 325 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Oct 9, 2015 to Oct 13, 2015: about 265 more stars than usual, peak 193 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Dec 20, 2015 to Dec 24, 2015: about 374 more stars than usual, peak 161 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jan 30, 2016 to Feb 19, 2016: about 5.2k more stars than usual, peak 1.3k in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jun 15, 2016 to Jun 21, 2016: about 163 more stars than usual, peak 49 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Feb 25, 2018 to Feb 26, 2018: about 95 more stars than usual, peak 92 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Apr 29, 2018 to May 4, 2018: about 164 more stars than usual, peak 59 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- May 27, 2018 to May 28, 2018: about 254 more stars than usual, peak 157 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jan 14, 2019 to Jan 16, 2019: about 198 more stars than usual, peak 117 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Oct 20, 2019 to Oct 21, 2019: about 101 more stars than usual, peak 98 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jan 23, 2020 to Jan 25, 2020: about 110 more stars than usual, peak 72 in one day, a shape we can't classify. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Mar 22, 2022 to Mar 22, 2022: about 63 more stars than usual, peak 75 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- May 11, 2022 to May 12, 2022: about 64 more stars than usual, peak 56 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Aug 15, 2022 to Aug 18, 2022: about 576 more stars than usual, peak 273 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Nov 16, 2024 to Nov 17, 2024: about 73 more stars than usual, peak 69 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Aug 27, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025: about 3.9k more stars than usual, peak 432 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Feb 19, 2026 to Feb 20, 2026: about 97 more stars than usual, peak 82 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Mar 3, 2026 to Mar 5, 2026: about 81 more stars than usual, peak 52 in one day, a flat block of stars. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Mar 25, 2026 to Mar 26, 2026: about 91 more stars than usual, peak 92 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Apr 24, 2026 to May 4, 2026: about 665 more stars than usual, peak 148 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jun 29, 2026 to Jul 3, 2026: about 366 more stars than usual, peak 183 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Aug 20, 2026 to Aug 24, 2026: about 353 more stars than usual, peak 177 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- 6 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 13, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- MIT (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- MIT (OSI-approved)
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 4.1 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/awesomedata/awesome-public-datasets)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 13, 2026: Caution
- Oct 13, 2026: Caution
Computed 19 hours ago · method 2026.10.2