aymericdamien/TensorFlow-Examples

Maintenance

Dormant

Human commits, 30 days

0

Human commits, 90 days

0

Human commits, 365 days

0

Bot share of commits, 365 days

0%

Last commit

Oct 23, 2021 (4 years ago)

Last human commit

Oct 23, 2021 (4 years ago)

Authors, 90 days

0

Last release

none found

Median PR merge time

2 days

Responsiveness: of 2 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.

• Only 2 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
• 61 pull requests are open and nobody has committed in a year.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Owner

Personal account

Commits sampled

100 since Jan 17, 2017

Authors for half of commits

2

Authors for 80% of commits

28

Contributors

60

Top committers

• aymericdamien: 48% of commits
• HosseinSheikhi: 2% of commits
• Jerry Ajay: 2% of commits
• kilarinikhil: 2% of commits
• Todd Tao: 2% of commits

• No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2017-01-17T09:10:21Z.

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Mostly organic, confidence high

Bursts

• Feb 15, 2016 to Feb 15, 2016: about 30 more stars than usual, peak 32 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Apr 15, 2016 to Apr 25, 2016: about 552 more stars than usual, peak 142 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• May 12, 2016 to May 13, 2016: about 113 more stars than usual, peak 107 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• May 31, 2016 to Jun 8, 2016: about 2.3k more stars than usual, peak 1.2k in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Oct 15, 2016 to Oct 18, 2016: about 90 more stars than usual, peak 47 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Aug 30, 2017 to Sep 9, 2017: about 1.5k more stars than usual, peak 396 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Sep 26, 2017 to Sep 28, 2017: about 712 more stars than usual, peak 612 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Dec 9, 2018 to Dec 10, 2018: about 68 more stars than usual, peak 69 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Jun 6, 2020 to Jun 12, 2020: about 323 more stars than usual, peak 111 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Mar 3, 2021 to Mar 4, 2021: about 63 more stars than usual, peak 59 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.

• 1 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

• Some star bursts have no matching forks, issues, releases, or launch coverage.
• Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Flags

• Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 2.5 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details

License

Now

MIT (OSI-approved)

A year ago

MIT (OSI-approved)

Packages

No published packages found.

OpenSSF Scorecard: 2.5 out of 10 (via deps.dev).

Sources: GitHub: aymericdamien/TensorFlow-Examples