codefuse-ai/Awesome-Code-LLM
[TMLR] A curated list of language modeling researches for code (and other software engineering activities), plus related datasets.
3.4k stars · 243 forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most commits, and no one has committed by hand in 90 days.
Why
- One person wrote 79% of human commits in the last year, and no human has committed in the last 90 days. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A human commit in the last 90 days, or a second person taking a large share of commits.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteSlowing
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 24
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- May 20, 2026 (4 months ago)
- Last human commit
- May 20, 2026 (4 months ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- under an hour
Responsiveness: of 6 recent issues, 0% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Organization
- Commits sampled
- 24 since Oct 15, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 2
- Contributors
- 15
Top committers
- Geralt-Targaryen: 79% of commits
- jiangjin1999: 4% of commits
- sachitkuhar: 4% of commits
- vinzid: 4% of commits
- xudafeng: 4% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence medium
Bursts
- Nov 15, 2023 to Nov 30, 2023: about 233 more stars than usual, peak 29 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- 2 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 15, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: codefuse-ai/Awesome-Code-LLM
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/codefuse-ai/Awesome-Code-LLM)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 15, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 3 hours ago · method 2026.10.2