datawhalechina/happy-llm

Maintenance

Slowing

Human commits, 30 days

0

Human commits, 90 days

3

Human commits, 365 days

32

Bot share of commits, 365 days

0%

Last commit

Aug 8, 2026 (2 months ago)

Last human commit

Aug 8, 2026 (2 months ago)

Authors, 90 days

2

Last release

Jan 29, 2026 (8 months ago)

Median PR merge time

24 hours

Responsiveness: of 3 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.

• Only 3 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Owner

Organization

Commits sampled

32 since Oct 14, 2025

Authors for half of commits

2

Authors for 80% of commits

11

Contributors

27

Top committers

• KMnO4-zx: 44% of commits
• CreekLou: 6% of commits
• sjjjoaps: 6% of commits
• 1985312383: 3% of commits
• acse-yz4421: 3% of commits

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Mostly organic, confidence high

Bursts

• Jul 2, 2025 to Jul 11, 2025: about 3.7k more stars than usual, peak 922 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Apr 26, 2026 to Apr 27, 2026: about 184 more stars than usual, peak 162 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.

• The star history was reset at some point, so earlier stars aren't counted.
• Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
• 3 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

• Forks, watchers, issues, and contributors are low for the number of stars.
• Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.
• The star history has a zero run of 26 weeks or more, so the analysis starts after it.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Flags

No risk flags.

License

Now

No license found

A year ago

Not known

Packages

No published packages found.

Sources: GitHub: datawhalechina/happy-llm