dwmkerr/hacker-laws
🧠Laws, Theories, Principles and Patterns for developers and technologists.
27.3k stars · 1.6k forks · HTML
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 87% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
Maintenance
CompleteSteady
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 11
- Human commits, 365 days
- 23
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 12%
- Last commit
- Sep 10, 2026 (1 month ago)
- Last human commit
- Sep 10, 2026 (1 month ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 2
- Last release
- May 19, 2026 (4 months ago)
- Median PR merge time
- 14 hours
Responsiveness: of 0 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 23 since Oct 14, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 97
Top committers
- dwmkerr: 87% of commits
- gaspodethewon: 9% of commits
- rjbarbour: 4% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence medium
Bursts
- May 13, 2019 to Jun 16, 2019: about 6.6k more stars than usual, peak 1.3k in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks.
- Sep 23, 2019 to Sep 25, 2019: about 57 more stars than usual, peak 28 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Nov 4, 2019 to Nov 8, 2019: about 602 more stars than usual, peak 329 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Nov 22, 2019 to Nov 28, 2019: about 837 more stars than usual, peak 607 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Feb 17, 2020 to Mar 9, 2020: about 2.8k more stars than usual, peak 852 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- May 13, 2020 to May 18, 2020: about 388 more stars than usual, peak 291 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jul 16, 2020 to Jul 22, 2020: about 176 more stars than usual, peak 46 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 20, 2020 to Sep 25, 2020: about 403 more stars than usual, peak 202 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Aug 12, 2021 to Aug 16, 2021: about 139 more stars than usual, peak 67 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jan 1, 2022 to Jan 21, 2022: about 3.8k more stars than usual, peak 795 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Feb 20, 2022 to Feb 25, 2022: about 165 more stars than usual, peak 57 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Mar 30, 2025 to Apr 16, 2025: about 407 more stars than usual, peak 81 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests, a new release.
- Jul 30, 2025 to Aug 1, 2025: about 50 more stars than usual, peak 35 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- The star history was reset at some point, so earlier stars aren't counted.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- The star history has a zero run of 26 weeks or more, so the analysis starts after it.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 3.1 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 3.1 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Sources: GitHub: dwmkerr/hacker-laws
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/dwmkerr/hacker-laws)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 9 hours ago · method 2026.10.2