e-n-f/if-then-else
!!Con West 2019 talk
372 stars · 14 forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Quick update: star history is from the full report of Nov 1, 2026.
Caution
One person wrote most commits, and no one has committed by hand in 90 days.
Why
- One person wrote 99% of human commits in the last year, and no human has committed in the last 90 days. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
- No human commits since December 2020. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A human commit in the last 90 days, or a second person taking a large share of commits.
- A new human commit or a release from a maintainer.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteStable
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Dec 13, 2020 (5 years ago)
- Last human commit
- Dec 13, 2020 (5 years ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- n/a
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
- No human commits in 365 days. Issue responses do not show unmet demand.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 72 since Feb 17, 2019
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 2
Top committers
- e-n-f: 99% of commits
- pvinis: 1% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2019-02-17T21:54:41Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence low
- The star history was reset at some point, so earlier stars aren't counted.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
- The star history has a zero run of 26 weeks or more, so the analysis starts after it.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
- Star history from the full report of Nov 1, 2026; this update did not re-read it.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: e-n-f/if-then-else
Compare
Weighing e-n-f/if-then-else against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/e-n-f/if-then-else)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/e-n-f/if-then-else/feed.xmlMore repos rated Caution
- kerlenton/
mcpsnoop 368 stars - zion-sati/
NetWasm 331 stars - YUTA-fywoo/
chatgpt-web-workers 328 stars - byebyebruce/
lockstepserver 421 stars - ChatAndBuild/
chatchat-skills 421 stars - gentoo-zh/
overlay 432 stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 13, 2026: Caution
- Nov 12, 2026: Caution
- Nov 11, 2026: Caution
- Nov 10, 2026: Caution
- Nov 9, 2026: Caution
- Nov 8, 2026: Caution
- Nov 7, 2026: Caution
- Nov 6, 2026: Caution
- Nov 5, 2026: Caution
- Nov 4, 2026: Caution