exacity/deeplearningbook-chinese
Deep Learning Book Chinese Translation
37.8k stars · 9.1k forks · TeX
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: no human commits in a year, though questions still get answers.
Why
- No human commits since November 2019. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A new human commit or a release from a maintainer.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteStable
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Nov 10, 2019 (6 years ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 10, 2019 (6 years ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- Mar 15, 2017 (9 years ago)
- Median PR merge time
- 12 hours
Responsiveness: of 1 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 1 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
- No human commits in 365 days. Issue responses do not show unmet demand.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Organization
- Commits sampled
- 100 since May 4, 2017
- Authors for half of commits
- 2
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 4
- Contributors
- 15
Top committers
- SwordYork: 42% of commits
- liber145: 30% of commits
- KevinLee1110: 5% of commits
- dangoron: 4% of commits
- zhoupeng: 4% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2017-05-04T01:40:41Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence medium
Bursts
- Mar 6, 2017 to Mar 9, 2017: about 117 more stars than usual, peak 67 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Apr 13, 2017 to Apr 27, 2017: about 1.9k more stars than usual, peak 437 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jul 4, 2017 to Jul 7, 2017: about 430 more stars than usual, peak 209 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jul 23, 2017 to Jul 30, 2017: about 518 more stars than usual, peak 180 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Nov 2, 2017 to Nov 3, 2017: about 154 more stars than usual, peak 149 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- May 14, 2018 to May 14, 2018: about 58 more stars than usual, peak 76 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Aug 15, 2018 to Aug 16, 2018: about 57 more stars than usual, peak 53 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Mar 25, 2019 to Mar 25, 2019: about 65 more stars than usual, peak 85 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jan 24, 2024 to Jan 25, 2024: about 74 more stars than usual, peak 47 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Dec 8, 2025 to Dec 11, 2025: about 130 more stars than usual, peak 75 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Aug 25, 2026 to Aug 27, 2026: about 152 more stars than usual, peak 116 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Sep 24, 2026 to Sep 25, 2026: about 98 more stars than usual, peak 89 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Oct 3, 2026 to Oct 4, 2026: about 125 more stars than usual, peak 68 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
- Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 1.4 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 1.4 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/exacity/deeplearningbook-chinese)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 13, 2026: Caution
Computed 14 hours ago · method 2026.10.2