faif/python-patterns
A collection of design patterns/idioms in Python
43k stars · 7k forks · Python
Caution
Caution: no license file.
Why
- GitHub found no license file, so the code is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteSteady
- Human commits, 30 days
- 2
- Human commits, 90 days
- 3
- Human commits, 365 days
- 20
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 55%
- Last commit
- Oct 9, 2026 (5 days ago)
- Last human commit
- Oct 9, 2026 (5 days ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 3
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- 2 days
Responsiveness: of 0 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Most commits in the last year come from bots.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 20 since Oct 14, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 7
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 13
- Contributors
- 122
Top committers
- ABHIRANJAN-KUMAR1: 10% of commits
- faif: 10% of commits
- PraveenMudalgeri: 10% of commits
- Binilkks: 5% of commits
- Darkslayer3324j: 5% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence high
Bursts
- Dec 30, 2013 to Jan 2, 2014: about 95 more stars than usual, peak 54 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Mar 10, 2014 to Mar 11, 2014: about 66 more stars than usual, peak 57 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 26, 2014 to Oct 2, 2014: about 212 more stars than usual, peak 90 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- May 8, 2015 to May 9, 2015: about 61 more stars than usual, peak 47 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jul 30, 2015 to Aug 7, 2015: about 265 more stars than usual, peak 84 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Sep 20, 2016 to Sep 23, 2016: about 88 more stars than usual, peak 51 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jun 11, 2018 to Jun 15, 2018: about 148 more stars than usual, peak 61 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Feb 19, 2019 to Feb 21, 2019: about 152 more stars than usual, peak 88 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Dec 27, 2020 to Dec 30, 2020: about 100 more stars than usual, peak 43 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Feb 22, 2021 to Feb 24, 2021: about 125 more stars than usual, peak 62 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Feb 21, 2022 to Mar 2, 2022: about 279 more stars than usual, peak 74 in one day, a shape we can't classify. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- May 30, 2022 to Jun 9, 2022: about 1.9k more stars than usual, peak 867 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post.
- Jun 27, 2022 to Jun 30, 2022: about 340 more stars than usual, peak 134 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Nov 25, 2022 to Nov 28, 2022: about 152 more stars than usual, peak 111 in one day, a shape we can't classify. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Mar 8, 2023 to Mar 9, 2023: about 57 more stars than usual, peak 47 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- 515 stars on a repo created before February 2013 have no date, so they aren't in the chart.
- 1 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- 515 stars on the creation day are undated (before 2013-02-10) and are not counted.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 5.1 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Sources: GitHub: faif/python-patterns
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/faif/python-patterns)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 13, 2026: Caution
Computed 15 hours ago · method 2026.10.2