geekcomputers/Python

Maintenance

Slowing

Human commits, 30 days

4

Human commits, 90 days

11

Human commits, 365 days

275

Bot share of commits, 365 days

24%

Last commit

Oct 10, 2026 (4 days ago)

Last human commit

Oct 10, 2026 (4 days ago)

Authors, 90 days

6

Last release

none found

Median PR merge time

19 hours

Responsiveness: of 7 recent issues, 14% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: 42 days.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Owner

Personal account

Commits sampled

275 since Oct 14, 2025

Authors for half of commits

1

Authors for 80% of commits

7

Contributors

404

Top committers

• geekcomputers: 57% of commits
• mr-d-luffy: 9% of commits
• khanhkhanhlele: 5% of commits
• NitkarshChourasia: 4% of commits
• Derderderr: 2% of commits

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Mostly organic, confidence high

Bursts

• Nov 3, 2018 to Nov 20, 2018: about 880 more stars than usual, peak 231 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Mar 9, 2019 to Mar 12, 2019: about 200 more stars than usual, peak 79 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Mar 18, 2019 to Mar 21, 2019: about 96 more stars than usual, peak 44 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Sep 26, 2019 to Oct 9, 2019: about 1.1k more stars than usual, peak 229 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Jun 8, 2020 to Jun 11, 2020: about 82 more stars than usual, peak 56 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Oct 3, 2020 to Oct 4, 2020: about 93 more stars than usual, peak 90 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Dec 1, 2020 to Dec 10, 2020: about 255 more stars than usual, peak 55 in one day, a shape we can't classify. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Mar 20, 2021 to Mar 30, 2021: about 1.1k more stars than usual, peak 214 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• May 22, 2021 to May 27, 2021: about 241 more stars than usual, peak 94 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Apr 10, 2024 to Apr 11, 2024: about 90 more stars than usual, peak 68 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Nov 4, 2024 to Nov 9, 2024: about 346 more stars than usual, peak 148 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Aug 5, 2025 to Aug 5, 2025: about 84 more stars than usual, peak 90 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.

• 1 stars on a repo created before February 2013 have no date, so they aren't in the chart.
• The star history was reset at some point, so earlier stars aren't counted.
• 2 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

• Some star bursts have no matching forks, issues, releases, or launch coverage.
• Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.
• 1 stars on the creation day are undated (before 2013-02-10) and are not counted.
• The star history has a zero run of 26 weeks or more, so the analysis starts after it.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Flags

No risk flags.

License

Now

MIT (OSI-approved)

A year ago

MIT (OSI-approved)

Packages

No published packages found.

OpenSSF Scorecard: 5.2 out of 10 (via deps.dev).

Sources: GitHub: geekcomputers/Python