googlehosts/hosts
镜像：https://scaffrey.coding.net/p/hosts/git / https://git.qvq.network/googlehosts/hosts
20.6k stars · 9.8k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: no human commits in a year, and most questions go unanswered.
Why
- No human commits since June 2021, and only 0 of 7 recent issues got a maintainer reply. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
- One person wrote 93% of human commits in the last year, and no human has committed in the last 90 days. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A release or merged commit from a maintainer, or replies to recent issues.
- A human commit in the last 90 days, or a second person taking a large share of commits.
Maintenance
CompleteDormant
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Jun 19, 2021 (5 years ago)
- Last human commit
- Jun 19, 2021 (5 years ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- 2 days
Responsiveness: of 7 recent issues, 0% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- No human commits in 365 days, and most issues go unanswered.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Organization
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Feb 28, 2019
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 8
Top committers
- beyondgfw: 93% of commits
- GoogleHostsSupport: 6% of commits
- sxyoxygen: 1% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2019-02-28T12:14:14Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence medium
Bursts
- Sep 16, 2019 to Sep 19, 2019: about 185 more stars than usual, peak 82 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 1.9 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 1.9 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Sources: GitHub: googlehosts/hosts
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/googlehosts/hosts)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 15, 2026: Caution
Computed 2 hours ago · method 2026.10.2