Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for security teams who need a concrete, runnable AI attack-surface inventory tool: red teams, blue teams, detection engineers, exposure-management teams, and bug-bounty hunters; for security teams who already have a port scanner (nmap, masscan, RustScan) and need the next layer of protocol-aware discovery (what is the HTTP service on port 8080 — an MCP server, an A2A agent, or an open LLM A
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip 7anX/AgentScan if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.
About this signal
7anX/AgentScan is tracked by RepoRadar as a ai protocol discovery scanner in the MIT Go-based protocol scanner that identifies MC section. It was first seen on 2026-06-25 and last updated on 2026-06-25. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and review needed setup difficulty. The standout signals for 7anX/AgentScan are workflow potential (8.6) and practical usefulness (8.3), while momentum (5.8) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the evidence RepoRadar has captured from captured source metadata. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.
How this item is evaluated
RepoRadar assigned 7anX/AgentScan a composite score of 7.9 out of 10, placing it in the Silver tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 61.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'low' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.
Risk explanation
Risk label needs manual review.