Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for security teams who need a self-hosted detection layer for the Shai-Hulud npm supply-chain worm (and any future credential-scanning worm with the same scanning pattern): blue teams, red teams, detection engineers, and SOC operators who need a documented way to plant fake-but-realistic credentials on production hosts and get alerted the instant an attacker-controlled process reads them; f
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Consider jestasecurity/thumper lower priority if you already have a working solution in this category.
About this signal
jestasecurity/thumper is tracked by RepoRadar as a self-hosted honeytoken platform in the Apache-2.0 self-hosted honeytoken platform for t section. It was first seen on 2026-06-25 and last updated on 2026-06-25. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and review needed setup difficulty. The standout signals for jestasecurity/thumper are momentum (10.0) and maturity (9.1), while setup ease (6.5) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the evidence RepoRadar has captured from captured source metadata. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.
How this item is evaluated
RepoRadar assigned jestasecurity/thumper a composite score of 8.4 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 120.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'low' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.
Risk explanation
Risk label needs manual review.