jakubkrehel/skills
A collection of agent skills that help you build great interfaces.
12k stars · 468 forks · Markdown
Quick update: star history is from the full report of Nov 8, 2026.
Caution
One person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 95% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
- Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.)
Maintenance
PartialActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 29
- Human commits, 90 days
- 100
- Human commits, 365 days
- 157
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Nov 10, 2026 (1 day ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 10, 2026 (1 day ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 2
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- under an hour
Responsiveness: of 21 recent issues, 90% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: 30 days.
- Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
- Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Nov 12, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 2
Top committers
- jakubkrehel: 95% of commits
- claude: 5% of commits
- Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence medium
Bursts
- Sep 3, 2026 to Sep 6, 2026: about 978 more stars than usual, peak 494 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Oct 25, 2026 to Nov 7, 2026: about 2.8k more stars than usual, peak 523 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
- Star history from the full report of Nov 8, 2026; this update did not re-read it.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- MIT (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: jakubkrehel/skills
Compare
Weighing jakubkrehel/skills against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/jakubkrehel/skills)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/jakubkrehel/skills/feed.xmlMore repos rated Caution
- kubeshark/
kubeshark 12.1k stars - AhmadHassan-BTed/
Turnitout-Humanizer 12.2k stars - cocoindex-io/
cocoindex 11.9k stars - presenton/
presenton 11.9k stars - RUCAIBox/
LLMSurvey 12.2k stars - FareedKhan-dev/
kimi-k3-in-c 11.8k stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 12, 2026: Caution
- Nov 11, 2026: Caution
- Nov 10, 2026: Caution
- Nov 9, 2026: Caution
- Nov 8, 2026: Caution