joshbuchea/HEAD
A simple guide to HTML <head> elements
30.3k stars · 2k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most commits, and no one has committed by hand in 90 days.
Why
- One person wrote 85% of human commits in the last year, and no human has committed in the last 90 days. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A human commit in the last 90 days, or a second person taking a large share of commits.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteSlowing
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 34
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 36%
- Last commit
- May 2, 2026 (5 months ago)
- Last human commit
- May 2, 2026 (5 months ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- 29 hours
Responsiveness: of 0 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 34 since Oct 14, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 69
Top committers
- joshbuchea: 85% of commits
- capjamesg: 9% of commits
- chemio9: 3% of commits
- szepeviktor: 3% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence medium
Bursts
- Sep 4, 2016 to Sep 5, 2016: about 69 more stars than usual, peak 63 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 14, 2016 to Sep 21, 2016: about 354 more stars than usual, peak 121 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Oct 24, 2016 to Oct 25, 2016: about 85 more stars than usual, peak 60 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Dec 21, 2016 to Dec 23, 2016: about 140 more stars than usual, peak 86 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Oct 25, 2017 to Nov 3, 2017: about 1.4k more stars than usual, peak 343 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Dec 20, 2017 to Dec 22, 2017: about 254 more stars than usual, peak 129 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Nov 28, 2018 to Nov 30, 2018: about 129 more stars than usual, peak 66 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Jun 11, 2019 to Jun 13, 2019: about 60 more stars than usual, peak 31 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 17, 2019 to Sep 18, 2019: about 57 more stars than usual, peak 44 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 29, 2019 to Oct 4, 2019: about 409 more stars than usual, peak 164 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jan 22, 2020 to Jan 24, 2020: about 92 more stars than usual, peak 58 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Apr 15, 2021 to Apr 17, 2021: about 50 more stars than usual, peak 24 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Apr 27, 2021 to Apr 30, 2021: about 218 more stars than usual, peak 155 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jun 20, 2025 to Jun 25, 2025: about 124 more stars than usual, peak 47 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
- Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 2.9 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 2.9 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Sources: GitHub: joshbuchea/HEAD
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/joshbuchea/HEAD)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 11 hours ago · method 2026.10.2