lerboe/beeper
Application-layer parsing in eBPF
164 stars · 9 forks · Rust
Quick update: star history is from the full report of Oct 20, 2026.
Caution
One person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 98% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
- Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.; Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.)
Maintenance
PartialActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 20
- Human commits, 90 days
- 130
- Human commits, 365 days
- 238
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 9%
- Last commit
- Nov 12, 2026 (2 hours ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 12, 2026 (2 hours ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 3
- Last release
- Oct 23, 2026 (20 days ago)
- Median PR merge time
- 19 hours
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
- Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 91 since Nov 12, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 5
Top committers
- lerboe: 98% of commits
- AbdelrahmanElsheikh965: 1% of commits
- claude: 1% of commits
- Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence low
Bursts
- Oct 9, 2026 to Oct 10, 2026: about 15 more stars than usual, peak 11 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post.
- The star history was reset at some point, so earlier stars aren't counted.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
- The star history has a zero run of 26 weeks or more, so the analysis starts after it.
- No engagement peer data covers this repository, so engagement is not compared.
- Star history from the full report of Oct 20, 2026; this update did not re-read it.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- GPL-3.0 (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- GPL-3.0 (OSI-approved)
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: lerboe/beeper
Compare
Weighing lerboe/beeper against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/lerboe/beeper)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/lerboe/beeper/feed.xmlMore repos rated Caution
- AndrewCTF/
velocity 153 stars - SeeRay11/
OpenFlow 178 stars - Kapendev/
parin 148 stars - TheJustinSunPrize/
awards 188 stars - dev2ex/
twig 131 stars - PacktPublishing/
Web-Development-with-Django 200 stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 12, 2026: Caution
- Nov 11, 2026: Caution
- Nov 10, 2026: Caution
- Nov 9, 2026: Caution
- Nov 8, 2026: Caution
- Nov 7, 2026: Caution
- Nov 6, 2026: Caution
- Nov 5, 2026: Caution
- Nov 4, 2026: Caution
- Nov 3, 2026: Caution