linexjlin/GPTs
leaked prompts of GPTs
32k stars · 4.3k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: no human commits in a year, though questions still get answers.
Why
- No human commits since September 2024. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A new human commit or a release from a maintainer.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteStable
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Sep 27, 2024 (2 years ago)
- Last human commit
- Sep 27, 2024 (2 years ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- 10 hours
Responsiveness: of 3 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 3 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
- No human commits in 365 days. Issue responses do not show unmet demand.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Dec 27, 2023
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 3
- Contributors
- 30
Top committers
- linexjlin: 63% of commits
- anchit-h: 10% of commits
- qtxwang: 7% of commits
- xywml: 4% of commits
- aidanfeltz: 3% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2023-12-27T02:53:02Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence high
Bursts
- Jan 15, 2024 to Jan 19, 2024: about 1.2k more stars than usual, peak 406 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Mar 20, 2024 to Mar 21, 2024: about 126 more stars than usual, peak 133 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jun 22, 2024 to Jun 24, 2024: about 202 more stars than usual, peak 127 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jul 1, 2024 to Jul 3, 2024: about 180 more stars than usual, peak 115 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Mar 16, 2025 to Mar 18, 2025: about 62 more stars than usual, peak 39 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jun 27, 2025 to Jun 29, 2025: about 86 more stars than usual, peak 43 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Oct 14, 2025 to Oct 20, 2025: about 714 more stars than usual, peak 274 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Nov 14, 2025 to Nov 18, 2025: about 281 more stars than usual, peak 112 in one day, a shape we can't classify. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- Dec 4, 2025 to Dec 5, 2025: about 70 more stars than usual, peak 53 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
- 5 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: linexjlin/GPTs
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/linexjlin/GPTs)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 11 hours ago · method 2026.10.2