mksglu/context-mode
Context window optimization for AI coding agents. Sandboxes tool output (98% reduction), persists session memory, and enforces routing across 17 platforms via MCP + hooks.
29k stars · 2k forks · TypeScript
At risk
At risk: one person wrote most commits, and no one has committed by hand in 90 days.
Why
- One person wrote 80% of human commits in the last year, and no human has committed in the last 90 days. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A human commit in the last 90 days, or a second person taking a large share of commits.
- Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Issues are disabled, so response time is not measured.)
Maintenance
PartialSlowing
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 1.1k
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 49%
- Last commit
- Oct 14, 2026 (19 hours ago)
- Last human commit
- Jun 29, 2026 (3 months ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- Jun 29, 2026 (3 months ago)
- Median PR merge time
- n/a
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
- Issues are disabled, so response time is not measured.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 254 since Oct 14, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 2
- Contributors
- 111
Top committers
- mksglu: 80% of commits
- ken-jo: 6% of commits
- NgoQuocViet2001: 2% of commits
- ousamabenyounes: 2% of commits
- kerneltoast: 1% of commits
- Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteMostly organic, confidence high
Bursts
- Apr 19, 2026 to May 4, 2026: about 3.6k more stars than usual, peak 543 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 7, 2026 to Sep 22, 2026: about 3.1k more stars than usual, peak 542 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026: about 1.3k more stars than usual, peak 298 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Oct 12, 2026 to Oct 13, 2026: about 1.6k more stars than usual, peak 953 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
- 4 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Forks, watchers, issues, and contributors are low for the number of stars.
- Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- Elastic-2.0 (not OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
- context-mode (NPM): latest 1.0.169, published Jun 29, 2026
Advisories for the latest version: none listed
Package and advisory data: deps.dev and OSV.
Sources: GitHub: mksglu/context-mode, deps.dev: npm context-mode
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/mksglu/context-mode)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: At risk
- Oct 14, 2026: At risk