mli/paper-reading
深度学习经典、新论文逐段精读
33.9k stars · 2.8k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most commits, and no one has committed by hand in 90 days.
Why
- One person wrote 89% of human commits in the last year, and no human has committed in the last 90 days. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
- No human commits since March 2025. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
What would change this
- A human commit in the last 90 days, or a second person taking a large share of commits.
- A new human commit or a release from a maintainer.
Maintenance
CompleteStable
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Mar 22, 2025 (1 year ago)
- Last human commit
- Mar 22, 2025 (1 year ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- 19 hours
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Issues are disabled, so response time is not measured.
- No human commits in 365 days. Issue responses do not show unmet demand.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Jan 5, 2022
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 9
Top committers
- Mu Li: 89% of commits
- youngfish42: 2% of commits
- zichenzhang04: 2% of commits
- astonzhang: 1% of commits
- bryanyzhu: 1% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2022-01-05T17:34:50Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence high
Bursts
- Jan 25, 2022 to Jan 27, 2022: about 226 more stars than usual, peak 115 in one day, a flat block of stars. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Mar 8, 2023 to Mar 12, 2023: about 532 more stars than usual, peak 185 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Dec 8, 2023 to Dec 14, 2023: about 986 more stars than usual, peak 321 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jul 30, 2024 to Aug 2, 2024: about 169 more stars than usual, peak 87 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Feb 15, 2025 to Feb 20, 2025: about 923 more stars than usual, peak 516 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- May 11, 2026 to May 15, 2026: about 244 more stars than usual, peak 165 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- 2 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- Apache-2.0 (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- Apache-2.0 (OSI-approved)
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: mli/paper-reading
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/mli/paper-reading)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 12 hours ago · method 2026.10.2