mqyqingfeng/Blog
冴羽写博客的地方，预计写四个系列：JavaScript深入系列、JavaScript专题系列、ES6系列、React系列。
31.1k stars · 4.6k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most commits, and no one has committed by hand in 90 days.
Why
- One person wrote 100% of human commits in the last year, and no human has committed in the last 90 days. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A human commit in the last 90 days, or a second person taking a large share of commits.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteSlowing
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 59
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Jun 9, 2026 (4 months ago)
- Last human commit
- Jun 9, 2026 (4 months ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- n/a
Responsiveness: of 0 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 59 since Oct 14, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 2
Top committers
- mqyqingfeng: 100% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence medium
Bursts
- May 25, 2017 to Jun 5, 2017: about 719 more stars than usual, peak 284 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Oct 24, 2017 to Nov 2, 2017: about 798 more stars than usual, peak 218 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Oct 9, 2018 to Oct 12, 2018: about 134 more stars than usual, peak 70 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- May 9, 2019 to May 9, 2019: about 75 more stars than usual, peak 93 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Mar 26, 2020 to Apr 8, 2020: about 1.3k more stars than usual, peak 397 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jul 7, 2021 to Jul 8, 2021: about 86 more stars than usual, peak 78 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Nov 16, 2021 to Nov 20, 2021: about 159 more stars than usual, peak 84 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: mqyqingfeng/Blog
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/mqyqingfeng/Blog)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 11 hours ago · method 2026.10.2