notaroomba/keybytes
A truly modular keyboard
451 stars · 13 forks · C
Quick update: star history is from the full report of Nov 1, 2026.
Caution
One person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 100% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
- GitHub found no license file, so the code is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
- A license file is added.
- Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.; Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.)
Maintenance
PartialActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 132
- Human commits, 90 days
- 139
- Human commits, 365 days
- 157
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Nov 10, 2026 (2 days ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 10, 2026 (2 days ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 1
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- n/a
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
- Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.
- Only 0 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Nov 12, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 1
Top committers
- notaroomba: 100% of commits
- Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence medium
Bursts
- Oct 24, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026: about 403 more stars than usual, peak 217 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks.
- The star history was reset at some point, so earlier stars aren't counted.
- Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
- The star history has a zero run of 26 weeks or more, so the analysis starts after it.
- Star history from the full report of Nov 1, 2026; this update did not re-read it.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: notaroomba/keybytes
Compare
Weighing notaroomba/keybytes against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/notaroomba/keybytes)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/notaroomba/keybytes/feed.xmlMore repos rated Caution
- intuit/
quickbooks-online-mcp-server 449 stars - DY-2026/
GameDesignOS 453 stars - openclaw/
openclaw-enterprise 459 stars - gentoo-zh/
overlay 432 stars - LTplus-AG/
ifc-lite 471 stars - byebyebruce/
lockstepserver 421 stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 12, 2026: Caution
- Nov 11, 2026: Caution
- Nov 10, 2026: Caution
- Nov 9, 2026: Caution
- Nov 8, 2026: Caution
- Nov 7, 2026: Caution
- Nov 6, 2026: Caution
- Nov 5, 2026: Caution
- Nov 4, 2026: Caution
- Nov 3, 2026: Caution