prakhar1989/awesome-courses
:books: List of awesome university courses for learning Computer Science!
71.9k stars · 8.4k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: no human commits in a year, and most questions go unanswered.
Why
- No human commits since November 2022, and only 0 of 5 recent issues got a maintainer reply. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A release or merged commit from a maintainer, or replies to recent issues.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteDormant
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Nov 12, 2022 (3 years ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 12, 2022 (3 years ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- 16 days
Responsiveness: of 5 recent issues, 0% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- No human commits in 365 days, and most issues go unanswered.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Feb 7, 2017
- Authors for half of commits
- 3
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 18
- Contributors
- 124
Top committers
- prakhar1989: 39% of commits
- spekulatius: 7% of commits
- chaorrupted: 5% of commits
- Louis: 5% of commits
- Ghost93: 4% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2017-02-07T15:48:22Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence high
Bursts
- Dec 22, 2014 to Jan 25, 2015: about 8.6k more stars than usual, peak 1.2k in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post.
- Apr 8, 2015 to Apr 15, 2015: about 682 more stars than usual, peak 251 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jul 22, 2015 to Jul 24, 2015: about 58 more stars than usual, peak 40 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Aug 25, 2015 to Aug 28, 2015: about 240 more stars than usual, peak 168 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Oct 23, 2016 to Oct 24, 2016: about 58 more stars than usual, peak 54 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- May 8, 2017 to May 11, 2017: about 228 more stars than usual, peak 97 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jun 9, 2017 to Jun 10, 2017: about 50 more stars than usual, peak 50 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Apr 25, 2019 to Apr 25, 2019: about 53 more stars than usual, peak 70 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Feb 10, 2020 to Feb 10, 2020: about 122 more stars than usual, peak 130 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jun 28, 2020 to Jul 2, 2020: about 486 more stars than usual, peak 163 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Nov 30, 2023 to Dec 5, 2023: about 472 more stars than usual, peak 202 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Jun 8, 2024 to Jun 9, 2024: about 156 more stars than usual, peak 110 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Oct 6, 2025 to Oct 7, 2025: about 62 more stars than usual, peak 62 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- Apr 27, 2026 to Apr 28, 2026: about 139 more stars than usual, peak 144 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
- 2 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 13, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
- Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 2.7 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 2.7 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Sources: GitHub: prakhar1989/awesome-courses
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/prakhar1989/awesome-courses)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 13, 2026: Caution
- Oct 13, 2026: Caution
Computed 18 hours ago · method 2026.10.2