punkpeye/awesome-remote-mcp-servers
A collection of remote MCP servers.
3k stars · 3.6k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Quick update: star history is from the full report of Oct 25, 2026.
Healthy
Actively maintained by 86 people, no known risks.
Why
No warning signs: none of the verdict rules applied to this repo.
What would change this
- Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.; Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.; Issues are disabled, so response time is not measured.)
- A dormant maintenance status, a deprecated or archived package, a successor link, or a critical advisory would change this.
Maintenance
PartialActive
- Human commits, 30 days
- 724
- Human commits, 90 days
- 1.9k
- Human commits, 365 days
- 1.9k
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 2%
- Last commit
- Nov 6, 2026 (5 days ago)
- Last human commit
- Nov 6, 2026 (5 days ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 86
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- under an hour
Too few recent issues to measure responsiveness.
- Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.
- Authors in the last 90 days are counted from the sampled commits only.
- Issues are disabled, so response time is not measured.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 98 since Nov 12, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 37
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 67
- Contributors
- 481
Top committers
- johnhowrey: 5% of commits
- Duffey234: 4% of commits
- bartosz-ciesielski: 3% of commits
- Dprevete: 2% of commits
- OndrejKnizat: 2% of commits
- Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteNot enough data, confidence low
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Not enough star history yet to judge the star count.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
- Star history from the full report of Oct 25, 2026; this update did not re-read it.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- MIT (OSI-approved)
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Compare
Weighing punkpeye/awesome-remote-mcp-servers against an alternative? See both side by side.
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/punkpeye/awesome-remote-mcp-servers)Follow
Get told when this verdict changes. Add the feed to any feed reader: you get one entry per change, not one per refresh.
https://reporadar.ai/punkpeye/awesome-remote-mcp-servers/feed.xmlMore repos rated Healthy
- matt8707/
ha-fusion 3k stars - dw-dengwei/
daily-arXiv-ai-enhanced 3k stars - Dicklesworthstone/
llm_aided_ocr 3k stars - eli64s/
readme-ai 3k stars - thu-pacman/
chitu 3k stars - zhizhuodemao/
js-reverse-mcp 3.1k stars
Earlier verdicts
- Nov 12, 2026: Healthy
- Nov 11, 2026: Healthy
- Nov 10, 2026: Healthy
- Nov 9, 2026: Healthy
- Nov 8, 2026: Healthy
- Nov 7, 2026: Healthy
- Nov 6, 2026: Too new
- Nov 5, 2026: Too new
- Nov 4, 2026: Too new
- Nov 3, 2026: Too new