tensorflow/models

Maintenance

Active

Human commits, 30 days

7

Human commits, 90 days

51

Human commits, 365 days

130

Bot share of commits, 365 days

0%

Last commit

Oct 7, 2026 (7 days ago)

Last human commit

Oct 7, 2026 (7 days ago)

Authors, 90 days

7

Last release

Feb 11, 2026 (8 months ago)

Median PR merge time

9 days

Responsiveness: of 2 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.

• Only 2 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Owner

Organization

Commits sampled

31 since Oct 14, 2025

Authors for half of commits

4

Authors for 80% of commits

9

Contributors

361

Top committers

• gurusai-voleti: 19% of commits
• oprypin: 16% of commits
• TF Object Detection Team: 10% of commits
• ahmed-akader: 6% of commits
• AleksMat: 6% of commits

• Commits pushed by accounts that sync other people's work, such as translation platforms, are left out of the shares.

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Mostly organic, confidence high

Bursts

• Mar 11, 2016 to Mar 11, 2016: about 14 more stars than usual, peak 15 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• May 12, 2016 to Jun 3, 2016: about 4.4k more stars than usual, peak 1.5k in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Aug 8, 2016 to Aug 11, 2016: about 119 more stars than usual, peak 51 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Aug 24, 2016 to Aug 26, 2016: about 271 more stars than usual, peak 154 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Sep 23, 2016 to Sep 30, 2016: about 481 more stars than usual, peak 160 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• May 7, 2017 to May 10, 2017: about 183 more stars than usual, peak 88 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Jun 15, 2017 to Jun 23, 2017: about 1.3k more stars than usual, peak 272 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Mar 15, 2018 to Mar 16, 2018: about 285 more stars than usual, peak 287 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Sep 22, 2020 to Sep 24, 2020: about 76 more stars than usual, peak 51 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Dec 30, 2020 to Jan 1, 2021: about 221 more stars than usual, peak 135 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.
• Oct 29, 2024 to Oct 30, 2024: about 109 more stars than usual, peak 95 in one day, a spike that tapers off. No outside explanation found, so this burst is unexplained.

• 1 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

• Some star bursts have no matching forks, issues, releases, or launch coverage.
• Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Flags

No risk flags.

License

Now

Apache-2.0 (OSI-approved)

A year ago

Apache-2.0 (OSI-approved)

Packages

No published packages found.

OpenSSF Scorecard: 7.3 out of 10 (via deps.dev).

Sources: GitHub: tensorflow/models