tiimgreen/github-cheat-sheet

Maintenance

Dormant

Human commits, 30 days

0

Human commits, 90 days

0

Human commits, 365 days

0

Bot share of commits, 365 days

0%

Last commit

Oct 15, 2023 (3 years ago)

Last human commit

Oct 15, 2023 (3 years ago)

Authors, 90 days

0

Last release

none found

Median PR merge time

3 days

Responsiveness: of 4 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.

• Only 4 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
• 20 pull requests are open and nobody has committed in a year.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Owner

Personal account

Commits sampled

100 since Jun 3, 2015

Authors for half of commits

1

Authors for 80% of commits

11

Contributors

76

Top committers

• tiimgreen: 53% of commits
• djbrown: 4% of commits
• rabellamy: 4% of commits
• doggy8088: 3% of commits
• ksato9700: 3% of commits

• No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2015-06-03T20:00:16Z.

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Organic, confidence high

Bursts

• Sep 21, 2014 to Sep 25, 2014: about 214 more stars than usual, peak 131 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Jan 18, 2015 to Feb 5, 2015: about 4k more stars than usual, peak 755 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a Hacker News post, a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
• Jul 28, 2016 to Aug 4, 2016: about 378 more stars than usual, peak 123 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Feb 8, 2017 to Feb 9, 2017: about 53 more stars than usual, peak 44 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Feb 13, 2017 to Feb 14, 2017: about 55 more stars than usual, peak 48 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Apr 9, 2019 to Apr 14, 2019: about 378 more stars than usual, peak 206 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
• Aug 8, 2020 to Aug 11, 2020: about 78 more stars than usual, peak 45 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Aug 12, 2021 to Aug 16, 2021: about 491 more stars than usual, peak 296 in one day, a shape we can't classify. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Sep 24, 2021 to Sep 27, 2021: about 342 more stars than usual, peak 195 in one day, a shape we can't classify. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Apr 24, 2022 to Apr 28, 2022: about 774 more stars than usual, peak 275 in one day, a shape we can't classify. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Nov 23, 2022 to Nov 24, 2022: about 235 more stars than usual, peak 186 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Feb 15, 2023 to Feb 16, 2023: about 148 more stars than usual, peak 124 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Jan 25, 2024 to Jan 26, 2024: about 56 more stars than usual, peak 50 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.
• Aug 9, 2026 to Aug 10, 2026: about 61 more stars than usual, peak 64 in one day, a spike that tapers off. We couldn't check for an outside explanation.

• 3 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 13, 2026).

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

• The star history looks organic.
• Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Flags

• Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 2.8 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details

License

Now

MIT (OSI-approved)

A year ago

MIT (OSI-approved)

Packages

No published packages found.

OpenSSF Scorecard: 2.8 out of 10 (via deps.dev).

Sources: GitHub: tiimgreen/github-cheat-sheet