trustgraph-ai/trustgraph

Connect ontology-grounded context graphs with deterministic AI agent governance to enforce business rules before execution and preserve decision evidence.

2.8k stars · 334 forks · Python

Caution

Caution: one person wrote most of the recent commits.

Why

One person wrote 72% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)

What would change this

A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
Partly checked: maintenance (Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.)

Maintenance

Partial

Active

Human commits, 30 days: 24
Human commits, 90 days: 82
Human commits, 365 days: 559
Bot share of commits, 365 days: 0%
Last commit: Oct 15, 2026 (5 hours ago)
Last human commit: Oct 15, 2026 (5 hours ago)
Authors, 90 days: 9
Last release: Sep 8, 2026 (1 month ago)
Median PR merge time: under an hour

Responsiveness: of 8 recent issues, 100% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: 3 days.

Commit counts are estimated: the commit sample stops before the window start, so GitHub's totals were scaled by the sampled bot share.

Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues

People

Complete

Owner: Organization
Commits sampled: 500 since Oct 15, 2025
Authors for half of commits: 1
Authors for 80% of commits: 2
Contributors: 29

Top committers

cybermaggedon: 72% of commits
JackColquitt: 15% of commits
sunnyadn: 2% of commits
rockenman1234: 2% of commits
jmolz: 1% of commits

Shares come from the newest sampled commits, since the commit sample is capped.

Sources: Commits, Contributors

Stars

Complete

Organic, confidence medium

Bars show stars gained each week. Orange bars overlap a burst.

Bursts

Nov 24, 2025 to Nov 25, 2025: about 28 more stars than usual, peak 16 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
Jan 1, 2026 to Jan 1, 2026: about 33 more stars than usual, peak 34 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
Feb 14, 2026 to Feb 14, 2026: about 77 more stars than usual, peak 82 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
Mar 22, 2026 to Apr 2, 2026: about 499 more stars than usual, peak 129 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.

Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.

The star history looks organic.

Sources: How star history is analyzed

Risk

Complete

Flags

No risk flags.

License

Now: Apache-2.0 (OSI-approved)
A year ago: Apache-2.0 (OSI-approved)

Packages

No published packages found.

Sources: GitHub: trustgraph-ai/trustgraph

Badge

Add this to a README to show the current verdict:

[![RepoRadar](https://reporadar.ai/trustgraph-ai/trustgraph/badge.svg)](https://reporadar.ai/trustgraph-ai/trustgraph)

Earlier verdicts

Oct 15, 2026: Caution
Oct 14, 2026: Caution

Computed 3 hours ago · method 2026.10.2