xitu/gold-miner
🥇掘金翻译计划,可能是世界最大最好的英译中技术社区,最懂读者和译者的翻译平台:
34.4k stars · 5k forks
This repo isn't software code, so code checks are limited.
Caution
Caution: no human commits in a year, though questions still get answers.
Why
- No human commits since January 2024. The repository holds mostly documentation, data or model files, so inactivity matters less than for a code library. (source 1, source 2, source 3, source 4)
- GitHub found no license file, so the content is not clearly licensed for reuse. (source 1)
What would change this
- A new human commit or a release from a maintainer.
- A license file is added.
Maintenance
CompleteStable
- Human commits, 30 days
- 0
- Human commits, 90 days
- 0
- Human commits, 365 days
- 0
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Jan 21, 2024 (2 years ago)
- Last human commit
- Jan 21, 2024 (2 years ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 0
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- under an hour
Responsiveness: of 3 recent issues, n/a got a maintainer reply. Median first response: n/a.
- Only 3 recent issues can be checked for a response, too few to measure response time.
- No human commits in 365 days. Issue responses do not show unmet demand.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Organization
- Commits sampled
- 100 since Jun 19, 2022
- Authors for half of commits
- 3
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 5
- Contributors
- 324
Top committers
- lsvih: 29% of commits
- itcodes: 18% of commits
- PassionPenguin: 18% of commits
- jaredliw: 10% of commits
- wangxuanni: 5% of commits
- No human commits in the last 365 days, so shares use the newest 100 commits back to 2022-06-19T06:42:36Z.
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteOrganic, confidence high
Bursts
- Dec 25, 2015 to Dec 29, 2015: about 79 more stars than usual, peak 33 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Feb 23, 2016 to Mar 2, 2016: about 260 more stars than usual, peak 61 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Apr 13, 2016 to Apr 15, 2016: about 103 more stars than usual, peak 58 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jun 21, 2016 to Jun 24, 2016: about 123 more stars than usual, peak 56 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Aug 18, 2016 to Aug 19, 2016: about 68 more stars than usual, peak 48 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Aug 30, 2016 to Sep 2, 2016: about 267 more stars than usual, peak 129 in one day, a shape we can't classify. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Oct 11, 2016 to Oct 14, 2016: about 346 more stars than usual, peak 144 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- May 15, 2017 to May 18, 2017: about 251 more stars than usual, peak 107 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks.
- Jun 27, 2017 to Jun 28, 2017: about 81 more stars than usual, peak 62 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jun 9, 2019 to Jun 11, 2019: about 135 more stars than usual, peak 101 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Jun 23, 2019 to Jun 25, 2019: about 143 more stars than usual, peak 101 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- Sep 7, 2022 to Sep 9, 2022: about 51 more stars than usual, peak 40 in one day, a spike that tapers off. Outside explanation: a jump in forks, a jump in issues and pull requests.
- 3 stars GitHub has since removed (tracked since Oct 14, 2026).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- The star history looks organic.
- Engagement is not compared for non-code or mirror repositories.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
- Warning: GitHub finds no license for this repository, so default copyright rules apply and no reuse is granted. Details
- Info: The OpenSSF Scorecard for this project is 3.5 out of 10 (deps.dev). Details
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
OpenSSF Scorecard: 3.5 out of 10 (via deps.dev).
Sources: GitHub: xitu/gold-miner
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/xitu/gold-miner)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 12 hours ago · method 2026.10.2