zhaoyang97/Paper-Notes
📚 数千篇 AI、LLM、NLP、CV 顶会论文解读，每篇 5 分钟读懂核心思想。
2.2k stars · 97 forks · Python
Caution
Caution: one person wrote most of the recent commits.
Why
- One person wrote 100% of human commits in the last year, so the project depends on them continuing. (source 1, source 2)
What would change this
- A second person takes a substantial share of commits.
Maintenance
CompleteSlowing
- Human commits, 30 days
- 10
- Human commits, 90 days
- 14
- Human commits, 365 days
- 174
- Bot share of commits, 365 days
- 0%
- Last commit
- Oct 3, 2026 (11 days ago)
- Last human commit
- Oct 3, 2026 (11 days ago)
- Authors, 90 days
- 1
- Last release
- none found
- Median PR merge time
- n/a
Responsiveness: of 6 recent issues, 100% got a maintainer reply. Median first response: 10 days.
Sources: Commits, Releases, Merged pull requests, Issues
People
Complete- Owner
- Personal account
- Commits sampled
- 174 since Oct 15, 2025
- Authors for half of commits
- 1
- Authors for 80% of commits
- 1
- Contributors
- 1
Top committers
- zhaoyang97: 100% of commits
Sources: Commits, Contributors
Stars
CompleteMostly organic, confidence medium
- Engagement is low for a repo this size (forks, watchers, issues, contributors).
Anyone can buy stars for any repo; bursts alone don't prove the owner did.
- Forks, watchers, issues, and contributors are low for the number of stars.
- Anyone can buy stars for any repo, so this describes the star history only.
Sources: How star history is analyzed
Risk
CompleteFlags
No risk flags.
License
- Now
- No license found
- A year ago
- Not known
Packages
No published packages found.
Sources: GitHub: zhaoyang97/Paper-Notes
Badge
Add this to a README to show the current verdict:
[](https://reporadar.ai/zhaoyang97/Paper-Notes)Earlier verdicts
- Oct 15, 2026: Caution
- Oct 14, 2026: Caution
Computed 2 hours ago · method 2026.10.2