Answer

What is Claude Opus 5.5, and what changes if you move from Opus 5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's newest Opus model, released on September 22, 2026 as the first model in the Claude 5.5 family. It is cheaper per token than Opus 5, Anthropic reports it is faster and uses fewer tokens per task, and it posts higher vendor-reported scores on agentic coding and computer-use benchmarks. It also ships four breaking API changes, a lower default effort level, and broader safety classifiers, so an existing Opus 5 integration can fail or behave differently after a one-line model ID swap.

Published · Updated · Evidence-linked, not search-volume ranked.

Short answer

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's newest Opus model, released on September 22, 2026 and served in the API as claude-opus-5-5. Compared with Opus 5 it costs less per token (4 US dollars per million input tokens and 20 per million output, against 5 and 25), cache reads drop from 0.50 to 0.20 per million, and Anthropic says typical workloads cost about 40 percent less and output arrives more than 30 percent faster. It keeps a 1M-token context window and 128K max output. The part that matters for anyone already running Opus 5 is the migration: thinking can no longer be disabled, forced tool use now returns an error, thinking blocks are bound to the model and conversation that produced them, the older computer_20251124 tool is rejected on the Claude API and Google Cloud, and the default effort level dropped from high to medium. Test those five things before you switch a production workload.

Why this question is current

Exact query-volume data was unavailable, so RepoRadar uses these as current demand and intent signals rather than a claimed volume ranking.

  • stories with more than 60 points, trailing 48 hours · Hacker News Algolia search_by_date · global English-language developer community · checked 2026-09-23T22:26:00Z
    The launch thread objectID 49803892 titled Claude Opus 5.5, created 2026-09-22T16:29Z, carried 1766 points and 1074 comments at check time, the highest-engagement story in the 48-hour window. A second item, objectID 49804316 linking the Artificial Analysis model page, carried 329 points. Interest signal, not search volume.
  • claude opus 5.5 · Google Suggest · US · checked 2026-09-23T22:27:00Z
    The seed returned itself as the first completion, followed by comparison phrasings such as claude opus vs gpt 5.5 and claude opus vs gpt 5.5 for coding. A second seed, is claude opus 5.5, completed to which is better claude opus or gpt 5.5. This shows the returned phrasing and a comparison intent, not a volume or rank.
  • geo=US trending searches · Google Trends Trending Now RSS · US · checked 2026-09-23T22:26:00Z
    Checked and returned no AI queries (all ten entries were sports, entertainment, politics, or finance). Recorded to show that no Trends ranking is claimed for this question.

Who this helps

  • developers running Opus 5 in production who need to know what breaks on upgrade
  • teams costing out agentic coding or long-running agent workloads
  • Claude subscribers wondering what the release changes for them
  • builders comparing frontier model list prices before committing a budget

What Opus 5.5 is

Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 on September 22, 2026 and calls it the first model in its Claude 5.5 family. The announcement says Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 will follow in the coming weeks, so today Opus 5.5 is the only 5.5 model you can call.

It is a hosted, proprietary model. The API ID is claude-opus-5-5, and it is also listed on Amazon Bedrock (as anthropic.claude-opus-5-5), Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry, and Claude Platform on AWS. The model page lists a 1M-token context window, 128K max output tokens, a June 2026 knowledge cutoff, and a retirement date no sooner than September 22, 2027.

The price change, stated plainly

List prices per million tokens fall across the board. The figures below come from Anthropic's model page and announcement; check the live pricing page before you budget, because list prices change.

  • Input: 4 US dollars on Opus 5.5, against 5 on Opus 5.
  • Output: 20 US dollars, against 25.
  • Cache reads: 0.20, against 0.50. Anthropic notes cache reads make up most of the cost of agentic and coding work, so this is the line most likely to move a real bill.
  • Cache writes: 5 for the 5-minute cache and 8 for the 1-hour cache.
  • Batch processing is half price, 2 and 10.
  • Fast mode, a research preview on the Claude API only, costs 8 and 40 and Anthropic says it is up to 2.5 times faster.

What Anthropic says improved

Anthropic reports that Opus 5.5 costs about 40 percent less than Opus 5 on typical workloads at default settings, because it is cheaper per token and uses fewer tokens per task, and that it generates output more than 30 percent faster. On its own benchmark table it reports 66.4 percent on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3 percent for Opus 5, 54.4 percent on FrontierCode against 48.0, and 81.8 percent partial credit on OSWorld 2.0 against 74.0.

Treat those as vendor-reported numbers. Anthropic itself writes that at this capability level benchmark margins have become a less reliable guide to real-world differences. One independent data point: Artificial Analysis listed Opus 5.5 at max effort first of 661 models on its Intelligence Index (score 58) when we checked, and also flagged it as verbose, using 260M output tokens on the index against a median of 91M. Rankings on that site change as models are added.

Four breaking changes to test before you switch

Anthropic's what's-new page lists four changes that can make an Opus 5 request fail on Opus 5.5. Each one returns a 400 invalid_request_error rather than degrading quietly, which at least makes them easy to catch in a test run.

  • Thinking cannot be disabled. Sending thinking type disabled, or a manual thinking budget, is rejected. Omit the thinking field or send type adaptive, and use the effort parameter to control depth and cost.
  • Forced tool use is not supported. tool_choice set to any or to a named tool is rejected. Use auto, and use strict tool use or structured outputs if you need schema-valid JSON.
  • Thinking blocks are tied to the model and conversation. Opus 5.5 can read thinking blocks from Opus 5 and earlier, but not from Fable or Mythos models. For API accounts created on or after August 31, 2026, replaying a thinking block after editing the system prompt, tools, or earlier messages returns a 400 by default. Keep conversations append-only.
  • On the Claude API and Google Cloud, the older computer_20251124 computer-use tool is rejected. Move to the computer_toolset_20260801 toolset. Amazon Bedrock still accepts the older tool.

Changes that do not throw an error

Three behavior changes will not fail a request, which makes them easier to miss.

  • The default effort is now medium. Opus 5 defaulted to high, so a request that never sets effort will think less than it used to. Set effort explicitly and re-run your quality checks.
  • Text the model writes between tool calls now arrives in thinking blocks, which are empty at the default display setting. An app that streams those progress notes to users will go quiet between tool calls until it sets a display value that returns the text.
  • There are more safeguard categories. Anthropic says most cybersecurity tasks are re-routed to Opus 4.8, a biology classifier now runs alongside the cyber one, and requests that push the model to reproduce its internal reasoning can be refused. Refusals come back as HTTP 200 with stop_reason refusal, so handle that value and configure a fallback model.

What it means for Claude subscribers

Anthropic says it is raising five-hour usage limits on Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans alongside the launch, and giving subscribers a rate-limit reset they can save and use when they choose. The announcement does not give the new limit figures, so we cannot tell you how much more usage you get.

Who should switch, and who should wait

Switching looks straightforward if you already run Opus 5 with adaptive thinking, auto tool choice, and the newer computer-use toolset, and your bill is dominated by cached input. The per-token cuts alone lower cost, before any token-efficiency gains.

Wait and test first if your integration disables thinking, forces a specific tool, edits earlier turns of a conversation, streams progress text to users, or does security research work that may now be re-routed or refused. Those are the paths that change.

Limits of this answer

RepoRadar has not run Opus 5.5 hands-on. Prices, specifications, and breaking changes come from Anthropic's documentation as checked on September 23, 2026. Benchmark scores are vendor-reported unless marked as Artificial Analysis. Anthropic also notes in its announcement that Opus 5.5 often suspects it is being evaluated, which it says makes pre-release safety testing harder to interpret.

A useful next action

Before changing the model ID in production, search your code for thinking type disabled, budget_tokens, tool_choice any or tool, and computer_20251124. Fix those, set effort explicitly, add handling for stop_reason refusal, then run your existing evaluation set against claude-opus-5-5 and compare cost and quality with Opus 5 on the same tasks.

Sources checked

  • Anthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 ↗ checked · vendor announcement, global

    Primary source. Release date September 22, 2026; first model in the Claude 5.5 family with Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 to follow; price per million tokens of 4 input, 20 output, 0.20 cache reads, 5 cache writes against Opus 5 at 5, 25, 0.50, 6.25; about 40 percent lower cost on typical workloads and more than 30 percent faster output; fast mode at 8 and 40 with up to 2.5x speed; benchmark table including Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode, and OSWorld 2.0; statement that benchmark margins are a less reliable guide; cyber tasks re-routed to Opus 4.8; higher five-hour limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise; note that the model often suspects it is being evaluated.

  • Claude Platform Docs: What's new in Claude Opus 5.5 ↗ checked · vendor documentation, global

    Primary source for the four breaking changes (thinking cannot be disabled, forced tool use rejected, thinking blocks tied to model and conversation with the August 31, 2026 account rule, computer_20251124 rejected on Claude API and Google Cloud but accepted on Bedrock), the default effort change from high to medium, text between tool calls moving to thinking blocks, new safeguard categories, refusal handling, batch pricing of 2 and 10, and platform model IDs.

  • Claude Platform Docs: Claude Opus 5.5 model page ↗ checked · vendor documentation, global

    Primary source for the 1M context window, 128K max output, June 2026 knowledge cutoff, 1-hour cache write price of 8, default effort medium, release date September 22, 2026, and retirement no sooner than September 22, 2027.

  • Artificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 model analysis ↗ checked · independent benchmark aggregator, global

    Independent third-party source. At check time listed Claude Opus 5.5 at max effort with default fallback as first of 661 models on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with a score of 58, and 260M output tokens used on the index against a median of 91M. Rankings change as models are added.

RepoRadar separates factual source claims from analysis. Recheck vendor docs before purchase, deployment, or policy decisions.