Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for developers who want a cheap final guard against agents claiming success without tests, outputs, or even basic evidence of what was checked.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip AtharvaMaik/donecheck unless the captured evidence suggests it solves a problem you are actively working on.
About this signal
AtharvaMaik/donecheck is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Coding Workflows section. It was first seen on 2026-06-28 and last updated on 2026-06-28. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and easy setup difficulty. The standout signals for AtharvaMaik/donecheck are workflow potential (9.7) and practical usefulness (9.0), while momentum (2.0) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the evidence RepoRadar has captured from captured source metadata. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.
How this item is evaluated
RepoRadar assigned AtharvaMaik/donecheck a composite score of 8.2 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 2.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'none' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.
Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
No inherent user-impacting risk is flagged from the captured evidence.