Item detail
github.com

cosmix/loom

RepoRadar surfaced cosmix/loom — a framework — into the Agent Frameworks & Orchestration section, where it sits at Gold tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.1 out of 10.

Score7.6
Popularity0.1
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty9.0
Momentum6.0
Maturity5.6
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential9.1
Setup ease4.2

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for teams running multi-stage autonomous coding work who need deterministic guardrails (shell-enforced commit/staging/worktree rules) outside the model's control, for engineering leads who want completion criteria enforced by loom itself rather than self-reports, and for codebases that benefit from per-stage memory journals feeding a curated knowledge base.

Where this stands now

cosmix/loom ranks #5 of 12 tracked Agent Frameworks & Orchestration items by composite score (7.6 against a section median of 7.6). The section currently carries 7 Silver, 5 Gold. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-08-10 (46 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: momentum at the 8th percentile; novelty at the 83th percentile.

Who should use it

teams running multi-stage autonomous coding work that need deterministic guardrails outside the model's control engineering leads who want completion criteria enforced by loom itself (artifact, wiring, dead_code) rather than self-reports codebases that benefit from per-stage memory journals feeding a curated, tiered knowledge base Claude Code power users who want parallel stage execution in isolated worktrees with progressive auto-merge

Who should skip it

Hold off on cosmix/loom if the setup requirements exceed what your current workflow or team can support without dedicated engineering time.

About this signal

cosmix/loom is tracked by RepoRadar as a framework in the Agent Frameworks & Orchestration section. First seen 2026-08-10; the source record was last checked on 2026-08-10. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and hard setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, cosmix/loom is strongest on workflow potential (9.1) and novelty (9.0) and weakest on setup ease (4.2) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The cosmix/loom record combines a 7.6/10 composite score with separate popularity (0.1), risk (conditional), and setup (hard) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Questions worth asking before you adopt this

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

Loom installs 16 Claude Code shell hooks plus a git pre-commit hook on the host repo; inspect commit-guard.sh, git-add-guard.sh, worktree-isolation.sh, and subagent-verify-guard.sh before installing, and confirm the bypass-flag token mechanism is acceptable for your team's threat model.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
agent-orchestration claude-code verification knowledge-distillation open-source mit hooks
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-09-25T13:50:57.994663Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

35 dated snapshots retained from 2026-08-10 through 2026-09-25; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score7.6 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.0 current · +0.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)56 current · +3 net
GitHub stars56 exact observation
Versionv0.9.0
Last release2026-09-23T11:26:59Z
Maintenanceactive
Current riskconditional
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude, Claude Code

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-09-257.69.056conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-247.69.056conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-237.69.056conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-227.69.056conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-217.69.056conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-207.69.056conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-197.69.056conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-177.69.055conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-157.69.055conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-137.69.054conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-127.69.054conditionaltry nowactive
2026-09-117.69.054conditionaltry nowactive

Why the record changed

version changed

Version changed: v0.8.8 → v0.9.0.

version changed

Version changed: v0.8.7 → v0.8.8.

version changed

Version changed: v0.8.6 → v0.8.7.

version changed

Version changed: v0.8.4 → v0.8.6.

stars changed

Stars changed: 55 → 56.

version changed

Version changed: v0.8.3 → v0.8.4.

version changed

Version changed: v0.8.0 → v0.8.3.

stars changed

Stars changed: 54 → 55.

version changed

Version changed: v0.7.1 → v0.8.0.

version changed

Version changed: v0.6.5 → v0.7.1.

stars changed

Stars changed: 53 → 54.

maintenance changed

Maintenance changed: source_activity_not_yet_measured → active.