Item detail
github.com

diegosouzapw/OmniRoute

RepoRadar surfaced diegosouzapw/OmniRoute — a developer tool — into the AI Gateway section, where it sits at Silver tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 8.8 out of 10.

Score7.7
Popularity72.0
Riskconditional
TierSilver
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum7.0
Maturity7.1
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential8.8
Setup ease8.8

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for developers and small teams who want a single endpoint fronting every model provider (free and paid), with auto-failover and aggressive token compression, without paying for a managed gateway.

Who should use it

individual developers and hobbyists who want to access 50+ free model tiers through one endpoint small teams running Claude Code / Codex / Cursor who want auto-failover between providers developers hitting rate limits on individual providers who want a fallback pool teams evaluating AI gateways against LiteLLM / Bifrost with a free-tier-first budget anyone building tooling that needs an OpenAI-compatible endpoint fronting many providers

Who should skip it

Consider diegosouzapw/OmniRoute lower priority if you already have a working solution in this category.

About this signal

diegosouzapw/OmniRoute is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the AI Gateway section. It was first seen on 2026-06-17 and last updated on 2026-06-17. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and easy setup difficulty. diegosouzapw/OmniRoute leads on workflow potential (8.8) and setup ease (8.8); its lowest signal is momentum (7.0), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned diegosouzapw/OmniRoute a composite score of 7.7 out of 10, placing it in the Silver tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 72.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

Free-tier providers change frequently — verify the providers you depend on are still active before committing to OmniRoute as your primary gateway; The '15-95% token savings' claim is workload-dependent — benchmark against your actual traffic before assuming the savings; API keys for every provider pass through the gateway — treat it as a credentialed service.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
ai-gateway free-tier claude-code codex cursor token-compression openai-compatible multi-provider
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-03T18:56:10Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

38 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-17 through 2026-08-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score7.7 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum10.0 current · +3.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)38,275 current · +21,754 net
GitHub stars38,275 exact observation
Versionv3.8.49
Last release2026-07-30T00:37:16Z
Maintenanceactive
Current riskconditional
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineAnthropic, Claude, Claude Code, Google Gemini, Model Context Protocol, OpenAI, OpenAI Codex

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-037.710.038,275conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-027.710.037,369conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-017.79.036,486conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-317.77.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-307.77.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-297.710.033,615conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-287.79.032,579conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-217.79.018,216conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-207.79.018,216conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-197.79.018,216conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-187.79.018,216conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-177.79.018,216conditionaltry nowactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 37369 → 38275.

stars changed

Stars changed: 36486 → 37369.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 36135 → 36486. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 36115 → 36135. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 36111 → 36115. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 36107 → 36111. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 32579 → 33615.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 32412 → 32579. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 18216 → 32412.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 18199 → 18216. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 18197 → 18199. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 18194 → 18197. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.