Item detail
github.com

dondai1234/agent-browser

RepoRadar surfaced dondai1234/agent-browser — an MCP server — into the AI Automation section, where it sits at Silver tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.4 out of 10.

Score7.9
Popularity1.0
Riskconditional
TierSilver
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum5.0
Maturity5.8
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential9.4
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for agent builders who want a leaner browser-control layer and care about token cost, faster orientation, and fewer round trips during web tasks.

Where this stands now

dondai1234/agent-browser ranks #4 of 9 tracked AI Automation items by composite score (7.9 against a section median of 7.9). The section currently carries 7 Silver, 2 Gold. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-06-30 (95 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: momentum at the 17th percentile.

Who should use it

Builders wiring browser automation into coding agents or workflow agents Developers who want a smaller MCP surface than Playwright-heavy setups Teams benchmarking token cost and browser-task reliability Power users who need one-binary browser automation with structured extraction

Who should skip it

Skip dondai1234/agent-browser if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.

About this signal

dondai1234/agent-browser is tracked by RepoRadar as an MCP server in the AI Automation section. First seen 2026-06-30; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-30. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and moderate setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, dondai1234/agent-browser is strongest on workflow potential (9.4) and open-source/build quality (8.4) and weakest on momentum (5.0) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The dondai1234/agent-browser record combines a 7.9/10 composite score with separate popularity (1.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Questions worth asking before you adopt this

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

It can act inside logged-in browser sessions, so first evaluation should use a separate browser profile with only the accounts and sites you intend to expose; Automated site actions can still hit CAPTCHAs, rate limits, or unintended form submissions, so keep early runs on test flows and non-production accounts.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
browser-automation mcp agents go chromedp mit
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-10-03T17:13:14.190776Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

74 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-30 through 2026-10-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score7.9 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum5.5 current · +0.5 net
GitHub stars (observed)29 current · +8 net
GitHub stars29 exact observation
Versionv4.0.0
Last release2026-07-24T09:20:20Z
Maintenancemaintained
Current riskConditional
Current verdictTry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude Code, Model Context Protocol

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-10-037.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-10-027.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-10-017.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-307.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-297.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-287.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-277.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-267.95.529ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-257.95.029ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-247.95.530ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-237.95.530ConditionalTry nowmaintained
2026-09-227.95.530ConditionalTry nowmaintained

Why the record changed

Stars change

Stars changed: 30 → 29.

Stars change

Stars changed: 29 → 30.

Stars change

Source-observed stars changed: 28 → 29. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

Integration change

Integration changed: Model Context Protocol → Claude Code, Model Context Protocol.

Version change

Version changed: v3.2.0 → v4.0.0.

Stars change

Stars changed: 22 → 28.

Stars change

Stars changed: 21 → 22.