Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for security and platform teams reviewing agent behavior in production: deploy AgentSight on a non-sensitive host with a known agent workload, study the event stream, and confirm the captured signals match the agent's documented behavior before extending it to higher-risk environments.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Pass on eunomia-bpf/agentsight if you need something non-technical and turnkey rather than a tool that requires comfort with CLI, dependencies, or system configuration.
About this signal
eunomia-bpf/agentsight is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Radar section. First seen 2026-06-16; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-16. The current verdict is 'watch' with a Gold tier and hard setup difficulty. The standout signals for eunomia-bpf/agentsight are novelty (9.0) and open-source/build quality (8.4), while setup ease (4.2) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The eunomia-bpf/agentsight record combines a 7.8/10 composite score with separate popularity (62.0), risk (conditional), and setup (hard) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
eBPF tracing requires recent kernels and root or CAP_BPF; production rollout should follow kernel and deployment reviews; system-level traces can capture sensitive data; limit capture scope to known agent processes.