Item detail
github.com

getcrew44/crew44

getcrew44/crew44 is a hosted app or demo in RepoRadar's Radar section, holding Gold tier and a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 10.0 out of 10.

Score8.7
Popularity100.0
Riskmedium
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity9.3
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence8.0
Workflow potential10.0
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for developers and small teams who already run multiple coding agents and want persistent specialist roles, parallel handoffs, and worktree isolation instead of re-explaining repo context to one generalist session on every task.

Who should use it

Developers who already use multiple coding-agent CLIs and want them to behave like a coordinated team instead of separate terminals Small teams that need per-project memory and reusable SKILL.md workflows without a hosted orchestration SaaS Operators who want isolated git worktrees for agent tasks so experiments do not trample the main working tree People evaluating specialist-agent workflows where planner, builder, reviewer, and designer each run on different runtimes or models

Who should skip it

Avoid running getcrew44/crew44 in production until you have reviewed its permissions, data-access scope, and failure modes in a sandbox.

About this signal

getcrew44/crew44 is tracked by RepoRadar as a hosted app or demo in the Radar section. First seen 2026-06-26; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-26. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. The standout signals for getcrew44/crew44 are workflow potential (10.0) and maturity (9.3), while setup ease (6.4) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The getcrew44/crew44 record combines a 8.7/10 composite score with separate popularity (100.0), risk (medium), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

Crew44 coordinates real coding-agent runtimes that can read files, edit code, and run commands in your repo, so the actual blast radius is still set by the underlying runtime permissions and model configuration; State lives under local project folders and ~/.crew44, so teams should review what chat logs, skills, and verification artifacts are retained before using it on sensitive client code; The workflow is strongest when you already have multiple agent CLIs installed; users expecting an all-in-one hosted model experience will still need to bring their own runtimes and model access.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
coding-agents agent-orchestration local-first worktrees skills desktop-app claude-code codex
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-13T20:20:15Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

39 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-26 through 2026-08-13; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.7 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum5.5 current · -2.5 net
GitHub stars (observed)356 current · -3 net
GitHub stars356 exact observation
Versionv0.8.1
Last release2026-06-11T10:07:30Z
Maintenancemaintained
Current riskmedium
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude Code, Google Gemini, OpenAI Codex

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-138.75.5356mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-128.75.0356mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-118.75.5357mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-108.75.0357mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-098.75.5358mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-088.75.5358mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-078.75.5358mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-068.78.0Not recordedmediumtry nownot recorded
2026-08-058.78.0Not recordedmediumtry nownot recorded
2026-08-048.75.5358mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-038.75.5358mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-08-028.75.5358mediumtry nowmaintained

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 357 → 356.

stars changed

Stars changed: 358 → 357.

stars changed

Stars changed: 358 → 359.

stars changed

Stars changed: 359 → 358.