Item detail
github.com

kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp

kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp is an MCP server in RepoRadar's Developer Tools section, holding Silver tier and a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.4 out of 10.

Score7.9
Popularity66.0
Riskconditional
TierSilver
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty7.0
Momentum6.0
Maturity7.1
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence8.0
Workflow potential9.4
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for coding-agent users who want persistent local project context without pushing code search and project memory into a hosted service.

Where this stands now

kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp ranks #118 of 1270 tracked Developer Tools items by composite score (7.9 against a section median of 4.9). The section currently carries 1032 Bronze, 134 Silver, 103 Gold, 1 Low Signal. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-06-26 (99 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: momentum at the 90th percentile; novelty at the 89th percentile.

Who should use it

Developers using Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, or other MCP-aware coding agents Teams that want local semantic search plus project memory on their own hardware Builders comparing memory-plus-codebase architectures for AI coding assistants People who want a zero-API-cost context layer using local models

Who should skip it

Skip kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp if the source repository or demo is inactive, unmaintained, or no longer matches the description shown here.

About this signal

kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp is tracked by RepoRadar as an MCP server in the Developer Tools section. First seen 2026-06-26; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-26. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and moderate setup difficulty. The standout signals for kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp are workflow potential (9.4) and open-source/build quality (8.4), while momentum (6.0) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The kruschdev/krusch-context-mcp record combines a 7.9/10 composite score with separate popularity (66.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Questions worth asking before you adopt this

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

The system stores code-derived context and project memory locally, so review the database and note contents before indexing sensitive repositories; Setup depends on local Postgres, SQLite, and Ollama components, which adds operational complexity compared with a single-binary MCP server; Memory and deep-search retrieval can surface stale or overconfident past context, so keep a human in the loop for important code decisions.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
mcp code-search project-memory ollama postgres developer-tools mit
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-10-03T17:13:14.190776Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

78 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-26 through 2026-10-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score7.9 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.0 current · +3.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)71 current · +3 net
GitHub stars71 exact observation
Versionv1.8.0
Last release2026-09-23T22:04:13Z
MaintenanceActive
Current riskConditional
Current verdictTry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineNo structured integrations recorded

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-10-037.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-10-027.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-10-017.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-307.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-297.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-287.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-277.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-267.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-257.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-247.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-237.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive
2026-09-227.99.071ConditionalTry nowActive

Why the record changed

Version change

Version changed: v1.6.3 → v1.8.0.

Version change

Version changed: not recorded → v1.6.3.

Maintenance change

Maintenance changed: maintained → Active.

Maintenance change

Maintenance changed: Active → maintained.

Stars change

Stars changed: 68 → 71.

Maintenance change

Maintenance changed: maintained → Active.