Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for Mac users who spend long stretches waiting on Claude Code and want a glanceable signal when the agent needs attention instead of babysitting the terminal.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip m1ckc3s/claude-status-bar if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.
About this signal
m1ckc3s/claude-status-bar is tracked by RepoRadar as a menu bar utility in the Developer Tools section. It was first seen on 2026-06-29 and last updated on 2026-06-29. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and easy setup difficulty. m1ckc3s/claude-status-bar leads on workflow potential (9.3) and setup ease (8.8); its lowest signal is maturity (5.7), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the evidence RepoRadar has captured from captured source metadata. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.
How this item is evaluated
RepoRadar assigned m1ckc3s/claude-status-bar a composite score of 7.8 out of 10, placing it in the Silver tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 1.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'none' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.
Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
No inherent user-impacting risk is flagged from the captured evidence.