Item detail
github.com

memodb-io/Acontext

memodb-io/Acontext is a developer tool in RepoRadar's Radar section, holding Gold tier and a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.7 out of 10.

Score8.2
Popularity8.4
Risklow
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity6.6
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential9.7
Setup ease8.8

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for AI agent builders, platform engineering teams, and LLM-ops engineers who need an Apache-2.0-licensed, open-source context-data platform that turns agent skills and self-evolving memory into a first-class runtime layer for AI agents, with observability hooks, an agent-development-kit integration, and a self-learning loop, so they can run an OSS agent-memory backend that captures skill

Who should use it

AI agent builders who need an Apache-2.0-licensed, open-source context-data platform that turns agent skills and self-evolving memory into a first-class runtime layer for AI agents platform engineering teams who want an OSS agent-memory backend that captures skill state, context, and learning across sessions without building the data plane themselves LLM-ops engineers who need observability hooks, an agent-development-kit integration, and a self-learning loop on top of agent memory open-source contributors who want an Apache-2.0-licensed alternative to hosted agent-memory vendors

Who should skip it

Consider memodb-io/Acontext lower priority if you already have a working solution in this category.

About this signal

memodb-io/Acontext is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Radar section. First seen 2026-06-21; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-21. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and easy setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, memodb-io/Acontext is strongest on workflow potential (9.7) and setup ease (8.8) and weakest on maturity (6.6) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The memodb-io/Acontext record combines a 8.2/10 composite score with separate popularity (8.4), risk (low), and setup (easy) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

It is an Apache-2.0-licensed context-data platform that runs locally and can be wired into an agent runtime, so review which skills and memory entries the platform is allowed to ingest, scope which agents can read or write the context store, confirm that the data-plane endpoints are auth-protected before exposing them outside localhost, and gate any production rollout behind a memory-retention review pass.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
agent-memory context-data agent-skills self-learning llmops agent-observability agent-development-kit open-source
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-13T20:20:15Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

44 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-21 through 2026-08-13; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.2 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum5.8 current · -2.2 net
GitHub stars (observed)3,668 current · +91 net
GitHub stars3,668 exact observation
Versionsdk-ts/v0.1.21
Last release2026-04-08T11:27:27Z
Maintenancemaintained
Current risklow
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineAnthropic, OpenAI

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-138.25.83,668lowtry nowmaintained
2026-08-128.27.53,666lowtry nowactive
2026-08-118.27.83,665lowtry nowactive
2026-08-108.27.53,664lowtry nowactive
2026-08-098.27.53,664lowtry nowactive
2026-08-088.27.83,663lowtry nowactive
2026-08-078.28.13,644lowtry nowactive
2026-08-068.28.0Not recordedlowtry nownot recorded
2026-08-058.28.0Not recordedlowtry nownot recorded
2026-08-048.28.13,644lowtry nowactive
2026-08-038.28.13,644lowtry nowactive
2026-08-028.28.13,631lowtry nowactive

Why the record changed

maintenance changed

Maintenance changed: active → maintained.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3666 → 3668.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3665 → 3666.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3664 → 3665.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3663 → 3664.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3644 → 3663.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3631 → 3644.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3594 → 3631.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 3590 → 3594. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3586 → 3589.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3580 → 3586.

stars changed

Stars changed: 3577 → 3580.