Item detail
github.com

momoraul/Lupen

RepoRadar surfaced momoraul/Lupen — a hosted app or demo — into the Developer Productivity section, where it sits at Silver tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 10.0 out of 10.

Score8.5
Popularity14.0
Risknone
TierSilver
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty7.0
Momentum4.0
Maturity6.4
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential10.0
Setup ease8.8

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for AI coding users who want a trustworthy answer to what a real session cost instead of relying on rough dashboard totals or memory.

Who should use it

Claude Code users Codex users engineering managers watching AI spend developers auditing expensive sessions

Who should skip it

Skip momoraul/Lupen if the source repository or demo is inactive, unmaintained, or no longer matches the description shown here.

About this signal

momoraul/Lupen is tracked by RepoRadar as a hosted app or demo in the Developer Productivity section. First seen 2026-06-20; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-20. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and easy setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, momoraul/Lupen is strongest on workflow potential (10.0) and practical usefulness (9.0) and weakest on momentum (4.0) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The momoraul/Lupen record combines a 8.5/10 composite score with separate popularity (14.0), risk (none), and setup (easy) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

No inherent user-impacting risk is flagged from the captured evidence.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
claude-code codex cost-tracking macos developer-tools
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-13T20:20:15Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

45 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-20 through 2026-08-13; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.5 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum7.5 current · +3.5 net
GitHub stars (observed)33 current · +1 net
GitHub stars33 exact observation
Versionv0.10.0
Last release2026-07-27T15:58:58Z
Maintenanceactive
Current risknone
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineAnthropic, Claude, Claude Code, OpenAI Codex

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-138.57.533nonetry nowactive
2026-08-128.57.533nonetry nowactive
2026-08-118.57.533nonetry nowactive
2026-08-108.57.533nonetry nowactive
2026-08-098.57.533nonetry nowactive
2026-08-088.57.533nonetry nowactive
2026-08-078.59.033nonetry nowactive
2026-08-068.54.0Not recordednonetry nownot recorded
2026-08-058.54.0Not recordednonetry nownot recorded
2026-08-048.59.033nonetry nowactive
2026-08-038.59.033nonetry nowactive
2026-08-028.59.033nonetry nowactive

Why the record changed

version changed

Version changed: v0.9.0 → v0.10.0.

stars changed

Stars changed: 32 → 33.