Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for founders, marketers, agencies, and AI product teams who want a reproducible way to see how often Claude mentions or cites a brand, without handing that job to a black-box SEO service.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip onism1767-creator/potato unless the captured evidence suggests it solves a problem you are actively working on.
About this signal
onism1767-creator/potato is tracked by RepoRadar as a ai visibility in the Evaluation section. It was first seen on 2026-06-28 and last updated on 2026-06-28. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. The standout signals for onism1767-creator/potato are workflow potential (9.4) and practical usefulness (9.0), while momentum (6.0) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the evidence RepoRadar has captured from captured source metadata. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.
How this item is evaluated
RepoRadar assigned onism1767-creator/potato a composite score of 8.3 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 1.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.
Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
Real runs send brand and competitor prompts through Anthropic, so sensitive launch or customer lists should be trimmed before the first live measurement; It currently measures Claude only, so teams should not over-read the report as a universal AI visibility ranking.