Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for any Claude Code user who wants to delegate reviews + tasks to Codex without leaving the Claude Code workflow. The durable differentiator is that this plugin is officially from OpenAI and binds Codex into Claude Code as a side-by-side agent instead of a parallel CLI — `/codex:review` runs on the current uncommitted changes or a `--base <ref>` branch, returns whatever reviews Codex
Where this stands now
openai/codex-plugin-cc ranks #3 of 74 tracked Agent Infrastructure items by composite score (8.6 against a section median of 7.7). The section currently carries 34 Silver, 29 Gold, 11 Bronze. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-07-04 (56 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: momentum at the 7th percentile; novelty at the 26th percentile.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip openai/codex-plugin-cc if the source repository or demo is inactive, unmaintained, or no longer matches the description shown here.
About this signal
openai/codex-plugin-cc is tracked by RepoRadar as an AI project in the Agent Infrastructure section. First seen 2026-07-04; the source record was last checked on 2026-07-04. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and review needed setup difficulty. openai/codex-plugin-cc leads on workflow potential (10.0) and practical usefulness (9.0); its lowest signal is momentum (3.5), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The openai/codex-plugin-cc record combines a 8.6/10 composite score with separate popularity (9.0), risk (low), and setup (review needed) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Questions worth asking before you adopt this
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
Risk label is still being reviewed from the captured evidence. Treat the item as unknown-risk until you review the linked source, permissions, setup path, and data access.