Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for teams that run agent systems and want baseline security checks before user-facing rollout.
Where this stands now
praetorian-inc/augustus ranks #412 of 2770 tracked Radar items by composite score (8.2 against a section median of 4.9). The section currently carries 1659 Bronze, 645 Gold, 466 Silver. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-06-17 (108 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: momentum at the 83th percentile.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip praetorian-inc/augustus for now if you are only tracking items with a 'try now' verdict.
About this signal
praetorian-inc/augustus is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Radar section. First seen 2026-06-17; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-17. The current verdict is 'watch' with a Silver tier and moderate setup difficulty. praetorian-inc/augustus leads on workflow potential (9.0) and open-source/build quality (8.4); its lowest signal is setup ease (6.4), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The praetorian-inc/augustus record combines a 8.2/10 composite score with separate popularity (87.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Questions worth asking before you adopt this
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
Security tests can be noisy and may require careful tuning to avoid blocking legitimate prompts; false positives need operational oversight.