Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for teams that need a practical way to test AI behavior repeatedly instead of relying on one-off manual prompt checks.
Where this stands now
promptfoo/promptfoo ranks #60 of 2304 tracked Radar items by composite score (8.7 against a section median of 5.2). The section currently carries 1197 Bronze, 645 Gold, 462 Silver. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-06-19 (100 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: momentum at the 79th percentile; novelty at the 79th percentile.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Move on from promptfoo/promptfoo if the licensing terms, language support, or platform requirements do not fit your project.
About this signal
promptfoo/promptfoo is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Radar section. First seen 2026-06-19; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-19. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. promptfoo/promptfoo leads on workflow potential (9.8) and practical usefulness (9.0); its lowest signal is setup ease (6.4), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The promptfoo/promptfoo record combines a 8.7/10 composite score with separate popularity (80.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Questions worth asking before you adopt this
Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
Evaluation runs can forward prompts, datasets, and model outputs to external providers, so scrub sensitive test data before using hosted model backends.