Item detail
github.com

samarailly51-pixel/opencode-harness

samarailly51-pixel/opencode-harness is a coding agent harness in RepoRadar's Developer Tools section, holding Gold tier and a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.9 out of 10.

Score8.4
Popularity6.0
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum6.0
Maturity6.3
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence8.0
Workflow potential9.9
Setup ease4.2

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for builders who want coding-agent experiments to become reproducible evidence with traces, reports, and comparable failure modes rather than screenshots and anecdotes.

Who should use it

Developers building or benchmarking Claude Code- and Codex-class coding agentsEvaluation teams that need traces, reports, and before/after comparisons instead of raw chat logsResearchers testing provider or loop-policy changes against the same workflowProduct teams that need a clean-room harness instead of anything derived from proprietary agent code

Who should skip it

Pass on samarailly51-pixel/opencode-harness if you need something non-technical and turnkey rather than a tool that requires comfort with CLI, dependencies, or system configuration.

About this signal

samarailly51-pixel/opencode-harness is tracked by RepoRadar as a coding agent harness in the Developer Tools section. It was first seen on 2026-06-29 and last updated on 2026-06-29. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and hard setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, samarailly51-pixel/opencode-harness is strongest on workflow potential (9.9) and practical usefulness (9.0) and weakest on setup ease (4.2) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the evidence RepoRadar has captured from captured source metadata. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned samarailly51-pixel/opencode-harness a composite score of 8.4 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 6.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

It can execute shell and MCP-style tool calls under a configurable permission policy, so start with the offline mock preset or a disposable repository before live runs.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
coding-agentsevalsharnesstracespythonmit